aw-dawm = mankind
eth-ha-aw-dawm relates to only two - the First Adam [horrible translation] and the Last [Yehoshuah].
Kenites are Sons of Cain - Yisra'el was told do not mix with others - "Do not commit adultery".
Treefarmer wrote: "There is only one Adam, the first man, who had children with his wife Eve (Chavvah), who was flesh of his flesh and who "was the mother of all living" (Gen. 3:20). All means all."
Apparently you have not read carefully the work I presented on What happened in the Garden. I completely disagree with this assertion and so does Scripture.
Regarding the Kenites, I have studied them for some time now - Nehemiah jumping on the backs of the men of Yisra'el - DO NOT TAKE WIVES OF THOSE PEOPLE. For the race you mention along with many others freely intermingled with the Nephilim - an attempt to wipe out the blood-line to Yehoshua - A pure bloodline. Satan's 2nd attack on the bloodline - in attempt to make it impossible for the Christ Child to enter this Age.
A pure blood-line; A pure blood-line; From One Man - Emphatically The Man.
Chavvah is the mother of All living because - she is the means where Yehoshuah will be born from the waters of a woman.
Gen 2 - Gen 6 - speak emphatically to only ONE man - that is if you can read the manuscripts. And if you will take the time to read the study that I provided you, you will see that the Man placed in the garden carries both the article and the particle. He is not ordinary mankind [aw-dawm]; created at Gen 1:27. Funny how chinese recorded history goes so much further back in time than yisra'el nation.
Ever read the front page of the 1611 KJV. If not, you should one day. The writers humbly presented that they did their best; yet they knew there were many errors and they cautioned the reader to do their own work - Yet who will search the depths of the Scriptures?
Regarding 2nd Peter 1 - That is why you had best have a good pre 65' stongs concordance and a Green's Interlinear so that you can see for your own eyes what the Hebrew and the Greek and the Aramaic writings - say.
There were many other people on that Ark beside Noah, his wife, his sons and his sons wifes. And to say that the Kenites are from Noah; well just return to the previous sentence. The Kenites are the Sons of Cain.
Furthermore, if Noah's flood was a so called worldwide flood - which it was not [ I believe] - how in the world would a dove find an olive branch? The Raven had all the food he needed - symbolic of end times - transformation of bodies - flesh lying on ground.
The purpose of Noah's flood, I believe, was to rid the world of the Nephilim [Angelic] hybrids - ever wonder why Yehovah would say to Yisra'el go in and kill every single one of them! Samuel even taking Sauls sword and chopping the foreign king to pieces in front of Saul because Saul was too much of a wus to do God's business.
Treefarmer wrote: Also, nowhere does the Bible say that angels or cherubim (such as Satan) have the ability to procreate sexually, even though angels sometimes appear in the form of men. Jesus makes this clear in Matthew 22:30 and Mark 12:25.
Apparently you have never read Gen 6. Or Kebra Negast.
Sons of God - Angels
Daughters of Eth-ha-aw-dawm - I know you read "man", right? Yet, in manuscripts - eth-ha-aw-dawm (go look for yourself and prove me wrong)
and they took wives of all they choose. And the women bare children to them and these became mighty men men of renown. I guess Jude was high on mushrooms when he said Angels left their former estate. Peter too as he talked about them as well. Yehoshuah too as he spoke to salvation requirement coming into this Age thru the "waters of a woman". These Angels Nephilim or Raphiim rode "their whirlwinds" - UFO's if you like - I know now I have really left the plantation, right? I can prove every bit of this in Scripture.
Said Angels are reserved in darkness and cannot receive Salvation - these look upon Satan - and say "You have become as one of us" - weak.
I have provided a study for those who would take the time to read it. Let the reader choose for himself/herself.
Alef/Tav = Eth - The first two characters of the Man in the Garden - emphatically is Eth - Even a poor man's Stong's Concordance today will bear that out.....
H853
את
'êth
Apparently contracted from H226 in the demonstrative sense of entity; properly self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely): - (As such unrepresented in English.)