Below is the rest of the email... It does NOT say one only needs to do it ONCE. In fact ever since 9/15/2011, I have
handwritten my exact specific declaration on the
FACE of every
check and
deposit slip I issue.... just to make it CLEAR by a PREPONDERENCE of
substantive evidence under their
FRE Exception to Hearsay Rule 803(6)(B) that from that date onward "
lawful money and full discharge is demanded for all transactions 12 USC 411, 95a(2)" applies to ALL transactions even if it is missing thereafter on transactions like direct deposits, debit/credit cards, EFTs, etc, where it is hard to make a record of one's demand. Remember, by making one's demand TRANSACTION-BASED, it does not matter what the signature card has on it or not. The
account does not matter - BECAUSE
YOU MADE YOUR DEMAND
TRANSACTION-BASED -
Please get this point! It is CRITICAL! One does NOT have to send letters to the bank, IRS, FRS, IMF, Treasury or Employer and thereby stir up needless trouble! Okay? IMHO -
K.I.S.S.
....
The Parallel Table of Authorities has
no entry for 12 USC 411. This table's entries go in sequence from 12 USC section 391 to section 418. Section
411 is
missing. This is confirmed at
http://www.gpo.gov/help/parallel_table.txt, excerpted below:
[Code of Federal Regulations]
[Parallel Table]
[Revised as of January 1, 2011]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access]
PARALLEL TABLE OF AUTHORITIES AND RULES
12 U.S.C. <---------------------------> Corresponding C.F.R.
================================================== =====
378............................................... ...........12 Part 303
391....31 Parts 202, 203, 209, 210, 225, 240, 306, 317, 321, 341, 346,
..............351, 352, 353, 354, 355, 356, 357, 358, 359, 363, 375, 380
418.................................................. ......31 Part 601
461........................................12 Parts 201, 204, 208, 217
"Therefore it is legitimate and preferable to make one's demand TRANSACTION-BASED, to wit:
"
lawful money and full discharge is demanded for all transactions 12 USC 411 and 95a(2)"
Using this
exact wording above enables one to provide probable cause and justification for listing all transactions on a custom-made 1040 SUPPORTING SCHEDULE that have been presumed to be using FRNs!!!
Who can rebut that demand? And by what authority? 12 USC 411 does NOT specify any wording requirement or transaction frequency, and there is no corresponding CFR regulation that requires anything.
One does NOT need to put it on any bank signature card, or on any contract!
Just decide on the date one wants to begin the demand and then start hand-writing it on the face of one's checks and deposit slips, just under one's name and address in the upper left-hand corner of the document. This then stands nunc pro tunc (now for then), thereafter and forever, as substantive evidence per FRCP 803(6) governing exceptions to hearsay evidence, and is unrebuttable.
This is the starting date of one's FREEDOM. Make it memorable!!
I believe making a clear public record that creates substantive evidence of all transactions demanding lawful money is the key, all done in good faith reliance on 12 USC 411 and 12 USC 95a(2), AND on the Father and His Son, who evidently have commanded this as a red line in the sand to be observed by all parties (including Satan) in this issue, namely Mt 22:21.
Beware of becoming an unwitting tool of the Adversary by undermining and doubting the remedy provided by the Creator that He promised to provide to His People in 1 Cor 10:13.
Remember the words given to Joshua in Joshua 1:9, and to Peter by the Messiah in Mt 14:31.
So claim this promise of remedy. Be courageous. Have faith!
Peace."[/I]
And I add now: Beware of adding regulations WHERE THERE ARE NONE, and thereby making the road more difficult for those that follow us who have successfully gotten refunds!
SUGGESTION: As a second witness, one might also record a
Declaration in the public record about this starting date of lawful money demands, and attach as Exhibits the first several checks and deposit slips... and several more throughout that year for good measure.
NOTICE:
Lawful Money Demand (12 USC 411) is only 1/3 of the remedy -
Full Discharge (12 USC 95a(2)) is second 1/3 - and
Claim for Harm by a man in his court of record at a public court building using his record declared at the county recorder is the last 1/3. More info on this is available at
iuvdeposit.wordpress.com When a county
Grand Jury becomes seated nearby, perhaps that may also be a venue for said
Claim. The
Sheriffs may by then be organized enough to enforce Judgments obtained by same.
It looks to be an interesting year in 2014... 14 means "DELIVERANCE" in the Bible. The Passover, as you know, was on the 14th.
Originally Posted by doug555
Below is the rest of the email... It does NOT say one only needs to do it ONCE. In fact ever since 9/15/2011, I have handwritten my exact specific declaration on the FACE of every check and deposit slip I issue.... just to make it CLEAR by a PREPONDERENCE of substantive evidence under their FRE Exception to Hearsay Rule 803(6)(B) that from that date onward "lawful money and full discharge is demanded for all transactions 12 USC 411, 95a(2)" applies to ALL transactions even if it is missing thereafter on transactions like direct deposits, debit/credit cards, EFTs, etc, where it is hard to make a record of one's demand. Remember, by making one's demand TRANSACTION-BASED, it does not matter what the signature card has on it or not. The account does not matter - BECAUSE YOU MADE YOUR DEMAND TRANSACTION-BASED - Please get this point! It is CRITICAL! One does NOT have to send letters to the bank, IRS, FRS, IMF, Treasury or Employer and thereby stir up needless trouble! Okay? IMHO - K.I.S.S.
Reply With Quote