The KEY ISSUE for a COMMON LAW GRAND JURY

[doug555]

My hope is that this thread entitled "The KEY ISSUE for a COMMON LAW GRAND JURY" will expose what really happened in this country between May 23, 1933 and June 5, 1933, and why it provides the KEY ISSUE for a COMMON LAW GRAND JURY to free our nation from the "Legalized Plunder" (see Bastiat's book by that name at: http://bastiat.org/en/the_law.html) perpetrated by the "Elites" and funded by its "Victims".

I have made some posts about this topic on Joseph Kelley's forum. He is the State Coordinator fro California for the National Liberty Alliance group.

Joe created a forum entitled DUE PROCESS for LAWFUL MONEY, and started this topic for discussion for me.

You may be interested in reading the posts there:
http://www.power-independence.com/fo...59&forum_id=29

Here are my 2 recent posts:
http://www.power-independence.com/fo...p?post_id=6968
http://www.power-independence.com/fo...p?post_id=6973


Perhaps we can generate interest about this topic here too...

I encourage you to contact your State and County organizers for more info, and to listen to the recent conference calls at:
http://my.blogtalkradio.com/nationallibertyalliance

Remember, the Saving to Suitors Clause preserves a Common Law remedy... the COMMON LAW GRAND JURY is a critical part of that remedy.

The National Liberty Alliance also has forums for each State, which you will find under the "Jurist" tab once you register on the site. Here is Joe Kelley's most recent post which I urge all to read VERY carefully, and see the CONNECTION to "demanding lawful money for all transactions" as THE specific tactic for the victims to stop feeding the perpetrators.

http://www.nationallibertyalliance.o.../23#comment-23

[allodial]

You can redeem items for lawful money or you can simply specify "lawful money" in all of your payment items. Alerting people and warning them is more editorial. Schooling them is toward the practical and functional.

[Joe Kelley]

[David Merrill]

Lately it has occurred to me that now the diversity of citizenship is defined clearly I might well make effort to revive Are You Lost at C? When my friend James Harlan filed his Libel in Review neither of us had a clue about redeeming lawful money and that doing so by demand defined the diversity.

I interject that as a stepping stone to the end I believe you seek on this thread; to form authoritative grand juries.

Forming the grand juries is definitely the way to go, the way to get it done. I have been on and before "common law grand juries". In theory they are great but the same deal keeps stumbling the process and that is the demand to be clear of contract with the Fed. I have had deputies in the booking area ask me if I spend "American Money" (FRN's). That is all they needed to hear when I affirmed that I used Federal Reserve notes.

I think my major breakthrough happened at a William THORNTON seminar in Black Forest. Not from Bill though, it was from one of the other students during breaks and lunch. He seemed intent on convincing me that all we had to do was study the way the Attorney General formed grand juries and then do that, right there in the same courtrooms!

Which begs the question, Why can't we?

In my opinion, and my objective lately is that larger numbers of people have to redeem lawful money to start recognizing the Authority - who is the Author of all Authority? I AM. Get out of the abomination of false balances and recover from civil death.

We were bouncing this around on the brain trust the other day:

knew better than to go theredo not understand natural lawseeking out the law and the physicsPs 82:3-4). Using a tool is not worshipping a false god.



This Grand Jury "tool" pre-dates the Constitution, and is re-affirmed in the Bill of Rights in the 5th Amendment.



It is non-partison, non-political, so it is does not interfere with a saint's duties as an ambassador of the kingdom.



The idea of having a group of men helping to judge His People came directly from the Creator (Num 11:16-30).



And the imminent Holyday 3 is all about the Creator establishing a special group of people from every nation on earth to become a literal physical kingdom of priests to reign on the earth BEFORE the End (Mt 24:14

http://nationallibertyalliance.org/comment/31#comment-31

My post on the National Liberty Alliance may provide the enforcement mechanism for this "Abolish the Fed" effort...



I do not think Congress, being under the Executive Branch since April 15, 1861, has the capacity to do it.



We need the Fourth Branch of government to do it... the Common Law Grand Jury.



It will only take one incident (CLAIM) of a man being harmed by being compelled to use FRNs to do it!



This brings Hab 2:6-8 and Zech 2:9 to mind...






--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: David Merrill <>
To:
Sent: Friday, January 3, 2014 5:35 PM
Subject: Abolish the Fed read and listen

ATTACHMENT.

Does anybody have a process server for the Fed in San Francisco?



Listen to the Article while you read along!

[doug555]

Lately it has occurred to me that now the diversity of citizenship is defined clearly I might well make effort to revive Are You Lost at C? When my friend James Harlan filed his Libel in Review neither of us had a clue about redeeming lawful money and that doing so by demand defined the diversity.

I interject that as a stepping stone to the end I believe you seek on this thread; to form authoritative grand juries.

Forming the grand juries is definitely the way to go, the way to get it done. I have been on and before "common law grand juries". In theory they are great but the same deal keeps stumbling the process and that is the demand to be clear of contract with the Fed. I have had deputies in the booking area ask me if I spend "American Money" (FRN's). That is all they needed to hear when I affirmed that I used Federal Reserve notes.

I think my major breakthrough happened at a William THORNTON seminar in Black Forest. Not from Bill though, it was from one of the other students during breaks and lunch. He seemed intent on convincing me that all we had to do was study the way the Attorney General formed grand juries and then do that, right there in the same courtrooms!

Which begs the question, Why can't we?

In my opinion, and my objective lately is that larger numbers of people have to redeem lawful money to start recognizing the Authority - who is the Author of all Authority? I AM. Get out of the abomination of false balances and recover from civil death.

We were bouncing this around on the brain trust the other day:

YES!!! And if the one bringing a CLAIM before a Common Law Grand Jury is on record as "demanding lawful money for all transactions", then a jury of his peers should also be on record as doing the same!

This means John Darash, the founder of National Liberty Alliance, should be informed of this "lawful money connection" and add it as one of the requirements to be a jurist on a Common Law Grand Jury in order to rule on such a "Claim of Trespass before Common Law Grand Jury" from a man who free from contract with the FED because said man is on the record as "demanding lawful money for all transactions".

I am in communication now with Joe Kelley, the California State Coordinator for the National Liberty Alliance, and he is now a member of my BLOG so I can get him quickly informed on this issue until he joins StSC, and then perhaps pass this critical connection along to John to rebut that debilitating nexus that has legitimately "stumbled" the Grand Juries in the past, as you state.

I will keep you posted on our progress...

Thanks David for bringing up this critical connection!

Great timing, in light of your statement: "my objective lately is that larger numbers of people have to redeem lawful money to start recognizing the Authority"!!

I love your "I AM" 3D Stereogram image of the "Burning Bush"... It took me a while to focus on seeing it though!

Perhaps we are rejecting that Authority by choosing FRNs over USNs.

Like the 3D Stereogram, they do even see the 2 choices laid out right in front of them on the one dollar bill.

And I believe Deut 24:15 does indicate that "delaying payment" is a SIN... a trespass. We are choosing the lefthand side of the FRN.

Perhaps that Authority cannot intervene for us because we are CONSENTING to this SIN and "Legalized Plunder" by not redeeming FRNs by not demanding lawful money for all transactions, by not choosing the righthand side of the dollar bill?

I am ready to promote your new website so we can achieve your new objective ASAP, and perhaps require all Common Law Grand Jurists to do this in order to be a jury of peers for those of us who are doing it now, and have claims of trespasses ready to bring before them.