Originally Posted by
David Merrill
Now a trust can be set up for you without your consent; such a trust is called a cestui que vie (what if you are dead?) trust. It was originally set up for you when you were legally incompetent (just born), and has persisted since then because you have done nothing to claim your estate from the trustee. Many comments on this web site have stated that the state 'owns' your legal name, and that you can't 'own' anything legally because you have 'no money;' such statements are confusing and unhelpful. The state registered your name, which was making a claim of ownership, but they did that to protect your estate, and they put the name into the trust, thus making a presumption that you wanted to contribute to paying off the bankers. And the state owns the trust. But the res of the estate is yours, including the name. However, until you claim it, the state owns it, and allows you to use the name, as long as you submit all your assets to them as collateral on the debt. The primary and mandatory presumption of a cestui que vie trust is that you are dead, or legally incompetent. When you make an appearance, you collapse the trust, and the trustee must return the res of the trust to you; the trustee is personally responsible for any debts he has allowed the trust to accept. So you need to make your demand for lawful money, ab initio (in the beginning) and nunc pro tunc (now for then) and file it in the public record. This constitutes the appearance which proves that you are not legally incompetent, and it collapses the trust. Further, since you are rebutting the original presumption that you wanted your assets pledged to the debt (they would not have been in the trust if you had been using lawful money from the beginning), you have discharged all debt claims against your estate; you have taken your assets out of the bankruptcy trust and claimed their legal ownership by your corporate person (YOUR NAME). However, your corporate person is still a US citizen, a statutory employee of the corp-gov, until you move the legal residence of YOUR NAME out of Washington, DC. To do this you must file with the Secretary of State of your state to claim YOUR NAME as a dba; the Secretary is required to record your claim to YOUR NAME in the state records, thus constituting an appearance to rebut the presumption that you want to be a statutory citizen. This restores your Constitutional rights, and takes YOUR NAME out of the jurisdiction of our current statutory courts. Statutory courts are not recognized by the Constitution; they are creations of the executive branch of our corporate government. They operate under contract law as defined in the Uniform Commercial Code. When you own your corporate person and it resides outside of Washington, DC, you are not in contract with the Federal government, so statutes do not apply to your corporate person. Note that statutes, which are not law, but are basically corporate rules, only apply to corporate employees. If the statutory court cannot show a contract that your corporate person has knowingly entered into (and then violated), they have no jurisdiction over it. Statutory courts never have jurisdiction over natural persons: contracts must be between equals, and the court is a corporate subdivision of the corp-gov, thus it can only deal with other corporations.
Comments, corrections, and criticism are invited.
Freed
Reply With Quote