Quote Originally Posted by froze25 View Post
I agree with what you are saying but that kinda implies the existence of the Straw-man (that I believe to be true). In their own documents they list that as a flag for frivolous filings. In other words it may be too much truth for them. So I will stick to my letter that does rebut their proposal while still working towards resolution (not arguing).
What would you expect them to say about it?

Remember, they are willing to lie to you in order to get you into their Jurisdiction

Like I said, hopefully others [like DM or MJ] will chime in