Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: What exactly makes Lawful Money untaxable ?

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #2
    The Fed is an instumentality (case attached) of the United States government because it is allowed to have stock (notes) that devalues intentionally.

    The priests are commonly misperceived to have no inheritance from God; but that is untrue - the priests inherited METRO; the cities and the suburbs. [Do you get it - in your face - Federal Reserve Board v. METROCenter! It gets no plainer than that. Incestual infighting brought it out - fiduciary responsibility. If the Fed were not an instrumentality of the US government it would be illegal to devalue its own stock!]



    Of course I thought to take my GPS phone to the Center of the Spiral.



    The Heart of the City - Facilities Operations!

    So instead of trying to justify the distortions you bring with your misdirection, by trying to convince readers here that I have proven nothing better, you might just be straighforward and admit you have no evidence of Coresource Solutions yourself Motla68.

    This is exactly what I am saying:

    I have seen it mentioned in here a letter from IRS David put up showing that when someone demands Lawful Money is telling them the person is not in the FR system.
    That is untrue!

    Yes. Thank you David.


    I was pushing my friend to discuss our redemption of lawful money with his sister that works in a legal department at IRS.


    She was very resistant and she would not discuss it even privately. I think they have a policy there at IRS.


    It has been 4 weeks since IRS has received my 1040 and my continuous insistence and questioning whether there are any new developments at the IRS regarding demanding lawful money per Title 12 USC 411; this Monday she finally said that typically IRS has 6 weeks to respond (sort of legal zone) and when someone is demanding lawful money he is considered out of the FR System. The IRS is creating a special file and that person's activities are being scrutinized by them.
    That is not a letter from the IRS.

    You insist on challenging my patience with the simple obfuscation of the contents of the robin egg-blue wrapper Motla68. The thing that is never going to happen though, is that you detract from the enjoyment I get out of this Website. I think what you are failing to comprehend is that most of the members here know too, like you, that this is only one side of the brain trust you should be interested in, rather than interested in disrupting with implications of Coresource Solutions - rather than showing us blatantly what that is. You try to be a guru here but you have nothing in your bag of tricks so it is time to reveal that.

    The only reason I get to come off such a narcissist around here is that I show people what I am basing my assertions in. There is plenty of room for more narcissists though; it is just when you have an empty bag of source materials for which to convince us you are so very smart, we are smart enough to become annoyed with your wasting our reading time!

    They shall be redeemed in lawful money on demand...

    It is constitutional for the Congress to define money in the US. And with the Emergency since 1861 that is fiat. The fiat is based in a good faith premise that the signatures on the bill, of the Secretary and US Treasurer are good IN GOD WE TRUST. However in 1913 we entered into another trust outside the scope of God; elastic currency.

    Pro 11:1 A false balance is abomination to the LORD: but a just weight is his delight.
    The Fed banks were given the choice to redeem the notes - it has been so since 1913. That is §16 of the Fed Act and codified into Title 12 U.S.C. §411 - the Banker's Code. In 1933 we the people were given the opportunity to become Fed banks too - to enter into that trust with the Fed. [Link is from The Public Papers and Addresses of Franklin Delano Roosevelt; 1933 - The Year of Crisis.]

    I can keep enjoying explaining the simple truth. That is why I am here (both places).

    Yours is an old attorney trick though. You want to keep me explaining it differently so that you can pick up on the deviations in the renditions and distort them like you did here with this new thread. - By saying I presented a letter from the IRS that says if you demand lawful money you are out of the Fed system.

    It is obvious by Title 12 it is true, but you want me to feed your distortion with more misdirection for a Quatloser-style attack on my credibility. I unabashedly tease the Quatlosers because I enjoy it Motla68. So grow a pair and show us what is in the robin egg-blue wrapper already so that we may find your 200 Posts might be worth the time we spent reading after all!



    Regards,

    David Merrill.
    Attached Files Attached Files
    Last edited by David Merrill; 04-02-11 at 11:22 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •