Thanks Anthony for supplying documents and your insights.
I also agree about COLB value. It makes sense that the birth "certificate" (COLB) has no value, BECAUSE the value is attached to the original signed birth "
application"... which we never see. Wonder if a FOIA/PA Request could get a certified copy of the application, which is the true "
pledge" or transfer of property "abandoned" at "birth"?
Here is
LINK to History of UCC filings by Boris, including UCC-3.
I also stored them
HERE.
Here are my questions and concerns:
1. Are not UCC Filings only NOTICE that an event has occurred, and not the event (transfer) itself? If so, then Boris's filings are not effective, and are "frivolous" if they are not based upon a event/transfer that occurred in reality via some other documents that have been executed?
2. Such "STRAWMAN" filings have been addresses recently (April,2014) by the National Association of Secretaries of State (NASS) report (final-nass-report-bogus-filings-040914.pdf) located in same folder link above. Perhaps Boris's filings need to be revised to avoid earmarks defined in this report.
3. I do not understand how the UNITED STATES became the Secured Party in Boris's filings. In particular, the box #2 "current record" entries do NOT make sense. Would not box 7 first be used to change the
Parties BEFORE being listed as such in the box #2 "current record"?
4. Can one legitimately make a full assignment
conditional?
5. Perhaps it would be better to assign this property to "
Alien Property Custodian" (APC) in accordance with 12 USC 95a and 50 USC App,
section 6 and
section 7 since the APC is charged with the duty of paying the bills of the "enemy"?