The BILL is NOT a BILL

[doug555]

The BILL is NOT a BILL - The New LAWFUL MONEY Currency!asset credit voucher "coupon" containing the credit amount that we must release/surrender to the Trustee (or agent thereof) by indorsing the BACK of the Bill, writing the demand for lawful money on the FRONT, and then returning it, to accomplish "Merger" for "extinguishment" of the obligation.

See this folder for more research information.

When the "dollar" fails, the "bills" will keep coming.

Just start using "bills" as the new currency, and lawful money, by demand!

The New LAWFUL MONEY CurrencyThe Way to outdo England without fighting herlawful money account to "draw" their credit from on a monthly basis, based on their current income and needs. Talk about a real stimulus package!!!



For more information about this, see:
http://iuvdeposit.wordpress.com/2014...d-bill-remedy/
http://usufructremedy.blogspot.com/p...ct-letter.html
http://lawfulmoney.blogspot.com/p/la...-currency.html

[Christopher]

have you done this? I am in the process of sending the coupon from passed bills to comcast trying to get a check back from them. And i am sending the coupon for the current to discharge the debt. i will let you know how it works. I have wrote on the front of the past coupons "Redeeming coupon for lawful money of The United States of America" and also on the front "This is not a check". I wrote this is not a check because as i understand the UCC code the coupon also seems to fit the criteria for a check and i don't fell like getting a check fraud charge of any kind. After reading what you posted I am also going to endorse the back

[doug555]

have you done this? I am in the process of sending the coupon from passed bills to comcast trying to get a check back from them. And i am sending the coupon for the current to discharge the debt. i will let you know how it works. I have wrote on the front of the past coupons "Redeeming coupon for lawful money of The United States of America" and also on the front "This is not a check". I wrote this is not a check because as i understand the UCC code the coupon also seems to fit the criteria for a check and i don't fell like getting a check fraud charge of any kind. After reading what you posted I am also going to endorse the back

I have not done this yet... I need to create all of the follow-through documents first.

Please listen to Boris's latest audio on 10/2/14 entitled "National Agenda - Usufructuary Truth"

Especially at the 0:28, 1:04, 1:11, 1:45 and 1:50 hour:minute marks to get some tips on these.

I believe Boris still has a fatal flaw because he is not using 12 USC 411 and demanding lawful money for all transactions... hence he is still contracting with the FED and becoming an enemy to the USA.

BTW: Why are you not using the example indorsement, letter and procedure ?

Also, have you rebutted on the record the presumption that the INFANT on "your" birth certificate is a decedent so that you are properly authorized (ie., upon your appearance on the record as being alive and thereby vested with reversionary interest in same) to act as General Executor of same's Estate?

Also, have you gotten it on record that you are demanding lawful money and full discharge for ALL transactions?

If not, you may be premature in your actions, and may set a bad precedent and muddy the water for others who follow this path.

Notice that Roger Elvick used to always ask those who sent him a charge "Where is the check?". Boris cited following Elvick in doing an acceptance for honor. My take is that the BILL is a CHECK, or rather a CREDIT VOUCHER, that is an instrument capable of transferring consideration (equitable title to the amount on the BILL). It just needs your indorsement, and, as indorser, under the UCC you have rights to recourse if said instrument is not presented for payment (for deposit to the United States). IMO.


Prov 24:6

[allodial]

have you done this? I am in the process of sending the coupon from passed bills to comcast trying to get a check back from them. And i am sending the coupon for the current to discharge the debt. i will let you know how it works. I have wrote on the front of the past coupons "Redeeming coupon for lawful money of The United States of America" and also on the front "This is not a check". I wrote this is not a check because as i understand the UCC code the coupon also seems to fit the criteria for a check and i don't fell like getting a check fraud charge of any kind. After reading what you posted I am also going to endorse the back

Could it be possible that the voucher stub is an incomplete draft?

[Michael Joseph]

Notice that Roger Elvick used to always ask those who sent him a charge "Where is the check?". Boris cited following Elvick in doing an acceptance for honor. My take is that the BILL is a CHECK, or rather a CREDIT VOUCHER, that is an instrument capable of transferring consideration (equitable title to the amount on the BILL). It just needs your indorsement, and, as indorser, under the UCC you have rights to recourse if said instrument is not presented for payment (for deposit to the United States). IMO.

Clearly the Legal Title is not in the End User. In fact the Equitable Title may not be in the End User either. For instance Trusts can be formed such as the Mass. Business Trust whereby the Legal and Equitable Titles are BOTH held in the Board of Trustees, which also has the Management of the Estate as well. The Personalty is in the End User which might be avails, profits and proceeds from a bargain and sale.

If you accept the Person of State is not your creation but it is moved via your will, thus by your will you express your trust as the moving party and as such the moving party is with the liability. This is an UNDERTAKING. A one-sided contract. A promise to perform as it were is an undertaking of sorts.

Thus the Person of State is completely subject to the Uses Settled by the Creator of the Trust Agreement. So it is simple in my mind. If one has a question concerning the uses of the Person, then one must ask the Administration - else one might be in Rebellion. See this is a double edged sword if you comprehend.

Regards,
Michael Joseph

[doug555]

Could it be possible that the voucher stub is an incomplete draft?

Exactly!

See Merger.

And Confusio - Merger -Extinguishment - Discharge.

[walter]

Its a defective bill because they don't have "consumer purchase" written on it.
It becomes defective when NOTICE is given of the defect.

Has anyone ever tried depositing a "statement" (bill) into a bank account?

[allodial]

Its a defective bill because they don't have "consumer purchase" written on it.
It becomes defective when NOTICE is given of the defect.

Has anyone ever tried depositing a "statement" (bill) into a bank account?

From reports, Amex bills have an associated bank rounting number( probably because Amex is a bank). In the "old days" (banking text books from long ago), where there are vouchers were checks. The idea was that you endorsed them payable to the biller.

Clearly the Legal Title is not in the End User.

The bill or notice itself might be considered to be abandoned.

[walter]

From reports, Amex bills have an associated bank rounting number( probably because Amex is a bank). In the "old days" (banking text books from long ago), where there are vouchers were checks. The idea was that you endorsed them payable to the biller.

In Canada if you send a statement then you must be a member of the Canadian Payment Association.

http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-21/

Bill payment Remittances
https://www.cdnpay.ca/imis15/eng/FAQ...c-c2203c0218b2

Rule H6
https://www.cdnpay.ca/imis15/pdf/pdfs_rules/rule_h6.pdf

[doug555]

Its a defective bill because they don't have "consumer purchase" written on it.
It becomes defective when NOTICE is given of the defect.

Has anyone ever tried depositing a "statement" (bill) into a bank account?

This is why I suggest this indorsement.

BACK OF PRESENTMENT, 90-DEGREE ANGLE, HAND-PRINTED, BLUE INK:

For Deposit Only
to the account of
United States
12 USC 342

John Henry Doe



This DEPOSIT is the next step... but all of the follow-up documents need to be in place first... based on research in this folder about "Confusio - Merger - Extinguishment - Discharge"

And about "indorser's recourse" in this book.

Notice that all "statements" demand "payment".

Why are we then tendering "promises of payment" known as FRNs?

[doug555]

This is why I suggest this indorsement.

BACK OF PRESENTMENT, 90-DEGREE ANGLE, HAND-PRINTED, BLUE INK:

For Deposit Only
to the account of
United States
12 USC 342

John Henry Doe



This DEPOSIT is the next step... but all of the follow-up documents need to be in place first... based on research in this folder about "Confusio - Merger - Extinguishment - Discharge"

And about "indorser's recourse" in this book.

Notice that all "statements" demand "payment".

Why are we then tendering "promises of payment" known as FRNs?

The Money In Your Bank Account Was Stolen This Morning!

Perhaps FRNs and checkbook money will soon not circulate AS MONEY given the report at the above link.

This is exactly why the Indorsed Bill Remedy is needed ASAP!

In conjunction with the Usufruct Remedy

If so, then the only thing left in circulation AS MONEY will be just the BILLS themselves.

Why not just indorse, return and enforce them as the negotiable instruments that they truly are?!

If dishonored, resurrect McFadden's 1933 charges lodged in the Judiciary.

David, would you know how to get a certified copy of those documents?

[doug555]

A good successful example in Italy of a "Debt-Free Alternative Currency"

debt-free alternative currency, called simec, and offered it at an exchange rate of 1-to-1.

Simec
www.simec.orga committee, with the Professor as the head, to keep the program going.

This program needed a wealthy benefactor to get it started (which the government could easily do itself), but it still shows the great potential of debt-free currency to facilitate economic growth and prosperity.

P.S. The above is not meant as an endorsement of "Thrive".


Also see: The Utopian Country

Also see: Indorsed Bill Remedy and Usufruct Currency

[David Merrill]

What a great website Doug! I love that slogan:

Accessing Your Own Value.

[allodial]

What a great website Doug! I love that slogan:

Accessing Your Own Value.

Might that have something to do with inheritance?

[doug555]

Quote Originally Posted by David Merrill View Post
What a great website Doug! I love that slogan:

Accessing Your Own Value.

Might that have something to do with inheritance?

You're right!

THE Inheritance!