The
FRE Hearsay Exception Rule 803(6)(B) is
critical to record formation for defending one's position. One MUST understand this BEFORE doing
anything. IMO, one MUST create
admissible evidence to successfully rebut legitimate and often outrageous diabolical presumptions. The Matrix runs on
records.
IMO, any "letter" is NOT
evidence. Sorry.
IMO, since the Gross Pay transaction was not in your demand, then that entire amount remains in FRNs, and you owe for that total FRN usage. IMO, the tax is transaction-based, and based on a taxable event - FRN
Usage. You may want to share your redacted "Demand Letter" so others do not make this same mistake.
Your comment above raises a VERY IMPORTANT ISSUE & LESSON.
IF the above was coming from disinformation agent, would it not be fairly easy to charge one with tax evasion if one
commingled funds by claiming "Net Pay" was NOT using FRNs?
Can you see how such a question posed above could easily be a TRAP if anyone espoused such a position?
See
Mt 22:18-21 for the Divine Law against
commingling of Caesar's and God's money. This account is the "red line in the sand" that is the enforcement behind 12 USC 411, IMO, at least for His bondservants who keep His Word, and claim its protections in His Name.
BTW, I have already more than once provided you with "
examples to get it right".
See again:
http://1040relief.blogspot.com/p/getting-started.html
Is there a reason this example is not clear?
I realize that I am the only one on this site requiring
this exact wording... perhaps you are seeking confirmation from others on this site?
IMO, the "
the pseudo-transaction-based Treasury demand letter" is NOT evidence, and can be completely IGNORED.
IMO, you cannot use the Schedule at all. Sorry. That would involve commingled funds given your scenario above.
If I may ask, where did you get that "ill-advised Treasury letter"?