Delayed addenda... it seems uncanny this thing called Communism, as if "mankind" needed help from "a special Commune-enlightened group" as to how to live life. How uncanny it is that the very same clique that have repeatedly set out to destroy traditional families, seem to fall silent over the fact that in the traditional family there isn't a hint of capitalism, money changing, this is where a child learns charity, everything is for the most part 'free'. If Communists were truly into charitable communes (instead control over the assets or resources of others), then why have they repeatedly and brutally set out to destroy the most fundamental, organic, patriarchal-matriarchical commune ever (i.e. the traditional family) and attempt to substitute and subvert it with imaginary political entities?
This doesn't work (just look at Soviet history).
As many times as Communism has shown to be a failure, why do they keep repeating the same mistakes at the expense of millions if not billions of victims--including but not limited to innocent children?
There aren't price tags, cash registers and security guards at every corner of little Johnny's house. In the traditional family Bobby and Suzie learn responsibility and the mom and dad make good ensamples so that when the kids grow up and deal with the external world, they are less vulnerable to exploitation. So why don't the Communists leave the traditional family commune alone?
Reply With Quote