That explains it for me quite clearly. This is still the effective verbiage - ...or exchanged for [Lawful Money].
What I see is that you used that verbiage stamp on the first one, and even though you changed it on the second ticket, the DA and judge presumed that you knew what you were doing mainly because of the first ticket's stamp.
Now before you think I am criticizing, I am also factoring in the woman who used only the stamp - who got her Setoff.
This makes sense to me within the verbiage of the current law:
On both citations you send them to the Treasury for redemption of thier charges. But the verbiage about lawful money is only expressed on the first ticket so in my science applied to your experience you can drop all the handwritten stuff but are wise to keep the stamped verbiage.
Understanding that you have to make your demand is a lot easier than studying extensively into trust law.
Amazing display of validation Motla68!! Kudos! And thank you.
Reply With Quote