So help me god

[Michael Joseph]

Trusts are administered in equity. If they were administered in law, the beneficiary would be shit out of luck.

pumpkin you are right. At law the trustee is not compelled to transfer property [rights, interests, titles - hereinafter "Interests"]. Once said Interests are in the possession of the Trustee, then said Interests may be seized by force - now enters the Conscience of the King in Chancellery. But don't be fooled pumpkin, Trusts exist UNDER law. But you are correct they are "these days" administrated in Equity.

Let me be clear, if I come to your court and tell you that you lack jurisdiction to hear my case, who is the bigger fool , me or you? Can a judge hear his own cause? What if you lack an oath as prescribed and ascribed in the Minutes [Congressional Record]? Is it still not your court? It is. But now you sit de-facto and according to CONSENT. He who would challenge your office of judge says "I don't trust you." Produce now the evidence of your office. But then again, consider the argument. One standing before a judge in his court demanding he prove he is a judge. See it is almost impossible for remedy. BECAUSE remedy must be sought on appeal.

The men who created the Unincorporated Association called the United States did it for themselves and their heirs. And that is the cold hard facts. It seems many minds were captured in the many wars. Many were fooled into thinking they somehow Pledged in support of the State. Unfortunately that is false. For the original Settlors, Creators pledged to EACH OTHER and to no other!

I wonder where they would find such a model?

ENOCH CHAPTER VI.

1. And it came to pass when the children of men had multiplied that in those days were born unto them beautiful and comely daughters.

2. And the angels, the children of the heaven, saw and lusted after them, and said to one another: 'Come, let us choose us wives from among the children of men and beget us children.'

3. And Semjâzâ, who was their leader, said unto them: 'I fear ye will not indeed agree to do this deed, and I alone shall have to pay the penalty of a great sin.'

4. And they all answered him and said: 'Let us all swear an oath, and all bind ourselves by mutual imprecations not to abandon this plan but to do this thing.'

5. Then sware they all together and bound themselves by mutual imprecations upon it.

6. And they were in all two hundred; who descended ?in the days? of Jared on the summit of Mount Hermon, and they called it Mount Hermon, because they had sworn and bound themselves by mutual imprecations upon it.

7. And these are the names of their leaders: Sêmîazâz, their leader, Arâkîba, Râmêêl, Kôkabîêl, Tâmîêl, Râmîêl, Dânêl, Êzêqêêl, Barâqîjâl, Asâêl, Armârôs, Batârêl, Anânêl, Zaqîêl, Samsâpêêl, Satarêl, Tûrêl, Jômjâêl, Sariêl. 8. These are their chiefs of tens.

Comment: Many already have allowed themselves to be swayed from the path. Look and stay on the bolded words. They were of ONE WILL an they were not going to give up what they started. One Thought, One Desire, One Will - mutually bound to each other for their own mutual benefit! They swore an Oath to themselves - and they "payed their vows". They "married" each other in CONTRACT.

Seems some others are eating some different Manna. Each according to his own appetite. Those who are not a party to the contract cannot argue about political rights in the Contract - because they have none. He who is not a party at best has civil rights granted - and said grant can be revoked at any time.

Nevertheless there is an agreement in place and those who take "public office" leave private capacity and are subject to the bylaws which govern said office. But remember he who is debtor is slave to the lender. And the lender will dictate to the debtor what the debtor will do. Enter the Judge as debt collector - stage left.

In order to keep matters straight I like to create circles [sets] and I see law as sets within sets - for at Trust the Trustee can be a Trust Organization and the Beneficiary can be a Trust Organization and the Board of Directors can be a Trust Organization.

Trust accounts can be created and the people can be "taught" to make their use. Thus the people subject themselves to the Administration of those who created said accounts.

===============

If the trust created under law is irrevocable, it can still be repealed by those who administrate the law.

However, what of the ability for the private man to contract? Is there any sanctity to the contract? Well, yes and no. Notice the ones in Enoch 6 formed their THING by Declaration and Mutual Pledge to each other. Sound familiar? Their thing was a New Thing. He who created Under an existing Contract is subject to the laws of the higher power. Thusly, if the contract contemplates property/estate within the law boundary of the higher power, then the lower contract can be annulled. For the Husband can annul the contract of the wife. However, the situation should warrant such grave actions. For a contract is Qodesh. For it is based on the Word of Men [Minds]. He who issues a false witness brings tribulation upon his own head UNDER Divine Law. No Legislative or Judicial action can save one from Divine Law. Govern thyself accordingly!

Shalom,
Michael Joseph