Results 1 to 10 of 23

Thread: Dutch East Indies Trading Company

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by shikamaru View Post
    Districts are created for specific purposes. Mustn't there be a joinder?

    The British East India Corporation (BEIC), in my opinion, is germane to English history as well as British America and US history.

    The BEIC is an example of a quasi-governmental, private corporation complete with its own private armies as well as exercise of sovereign prerogatives.
    Thank you Allodial! That clarifies things a bit.

    Shikamaru;


    I am not dismissing the effects of the British Indies Trading Company. I am saying that sociopathic tyranny is breach of trust.

    During a business lull in the late 1600's there appears to have been some kind of hostile takeover. But there is still 180 more years of history that I have to catch up on with the OP videos. My interest is keen. Quite literally as I have been suspecting that Grand Freemason WASHINGTON anointed young Peter VAN PELT with authority to keep the Dutch trust going through American manorial law.


    Long ago I came up with this idea of the United States being a joint venture between the sovereign states of America and the UK since the Treaty of Paris,

    If the breach of trust occurred prior, then the subsequent actions are disqualified de facto ab initio. Maybe not, in the de facto sense. But lately I am resorting to ideals de jure and finding this explains things quite coherently. Hopefully if you all catch up by watching the videos, you can get a glimpse or two!


    Attachment 3845


    This is the Van Pelt Milestone displayed next to George WASHINGTON weaponry in the Brooklyn Historical Society.
    Last edited by David Merrill; 04-13-16 at 05:25 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •