Quote Originally Posted by Christopher-T:Farley View Post
I have to thank you David for getting my bearings right, I made a mistake by even acknowledging the statute is valid, when in reality statutes are void since the Const. is void by and because of the saving to suitors clause right? please clearify my mistake so i can fix them,
I can't quite make any sense of that. I believe a common misconception is that one is party to the contract and therefore has a stake and claim in the actual Constitution itself. Once an official has sworn out an oath, he is obligated by undertaking to respect the Bill(s) of Rights as he swears to.