Quote Originally Posted by Gavilan View Post
Someone just told me you were being pedantic, and that the court had said as much.

I asked, if it were her case and the sole essential arbiter to see that the one rendering judgement was being objective and just, wouldn't you care that the oath was correct. Why deviate from the simple English form? There was no retort.
There is an oxymoron within the post. At least I do not think it only me.

What would it matter what the court said if there was no court? If the "judge" was running a vacant office, due to the execution of law, then there was never any judicial function extant.