Abide vs Reside.

[Michael Joseph]

being resident within a law boundary is not necessarily a bad situation. Abiding in the truth and justice with intent of mutual beneficial relationships is the hope and goal. What is the law which governs such a goal? The law of love.

But what happens when an accident occurs? How will equity be restored? For indeed I perceive an accident was just that - accidental. What were the primary causes which impelled said accident - thusly is liability affixed upon the so called "accident". Upon whose estate shall the liability be affixed [charged]? Should you be made to pay for my accident?

One will say no, but is that true? Not really, because in reality if we pledge towards the support of a particular society, then we all understand the liabilities within that society subject to the laws of which we agree to live under. In theory the system is beautiful, in practice, not so much. Enter ego, greed, power, prestige, etc. and that nasty lust - stage LEFT.

Can there be a state absent a person? consider that at once when a corporation of men and women band together to form state they do so and seeing the Light they observe that they have done good and they name their organization so that others might come to rely upon the good faith or good name established by those who understand said society called state.

Now once the state is named does it cease to exist? I think not. Those who pledge to support said state are resident and subject to the laws of said state. And that friends is a good thing!

Pro_22:1 A good name is rather to be chosen than great riches, and loving favour rather than silver and gold.

A good name huh. Enter the gainsayers stage left - reporting that a name is fiction. And guess what they are right. Michael Joseph my name is - but that name is not Me. It is a fiction derived for relationships of all sorts. Add a SURNAME and one is affixed to a particular society - legal to a certain law boundary.

In other words, if one uses the term LEGAL, then one must at once ascribe the law boundary of which the transaction or property or estate is Legal unto. Thusly a "legal" tender within the law boundary of the United States may not be a "legal" tender within the state of China. The people of China may not choose to accept the credit in the name of the people of the United States.

He who pledges his good faith and trust to understand a society [State] adds value to the Estate. And thusly are debts contracted upon the trust pledged. The only question is: Did you receive a benefit? He who is with the benefit is also with the obligation - this is equity and is just.


Shalom,
MJ