xparte, perhaps you should take a good look at that PEI or ON driver license and see what state, venue or district that XPARTE DOE lives in. It is the organic Man who deemed to sign as surety (endorser) for XPARTE DOE 100 MAPLE LN SOMETHING PE. Perhaps you aren't seeing that. The reason they are going after the man is because they presume that he in sound mind voluntarily and with full disclosure chose to be accommodation party and surety for XPARTE DOE. I would suggest that its better to file a bond for discharging liability incurred by the VESSEL and when you R4C and instructing those seeking nuisance payment from you to seek their nuisance payment through the Attorney General. They are collecting revenue for paying debt they incurred by pre-selling the revenue stream to some corporation.
Ed... Warmon (?) of detaxcanada fame had some example bonds on his site.
(I keep pointing at the simple remedy, so few pay attention. They are holding the money Article 8 indirectly held asset style.)
Reply With Quote