Results 1 to 10 of 48

Thread: The MENDOZA Order

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #26
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    310
    MENDOZA made final judgment on March 25th - summary judgment for the Defendant, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. At least on Schlabach's 2013 claim.
    Document 25
    Document 26

    I see more problems with SCHLABACH's claim. From page 5:
    In his Form 1040, Schlabach claimed $54,084 in “[w]ages, salaries, tips, etc.” from IRS Form W-2; subtracted $54,084 in “[o]ther income” he purported to have “REDEEMED IN LAWFUL MONEY PER 12 U.S.C. 411 ab initio”; then claimed zero dollars in “total income,” “adjusted gross income,” “taxable income,” and tax liability.
    It's impossible for an employee grossing $54,084 to have $54,084 in net pay to redeem in lawful money. Schlabach's net pay (actual paycheck amounts) after SS, Medicare, FITW, & State tax deductions would be more in the neighborhood of $36,250. His self-assessment is substantially incorrect.

    And what is “REDEEMED IN LAWFUL MONEY PER 12 U.S.C. 411 ab initio” From the beginning? Beginning of when? Where are the copies of redeemed LM checks? Signature card? marked up copy of Notice & Demand? I see none in this claim. It's one thing to say you're redeeming lawful money and quite another to actually do it and back it up with proof. This is rule #2 of the the lesson plan - keep the record. SCHLABACH claim fails rules of evidence.

    Name:  Schlabach net pay.jpg
Views: 1020
Size:  158.6 KB
    Last edited by lorne; 04-01-19 at 02:14 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •