-
Administrator
Here is the rejection letter from the same DoJ, anyway:
Attachment 5482
Spouting "special circumstances" yet in the wake of delivery.
Her witness, Thomas HOGAN shows no more promise of being bonded...
So looking over her behaviors, she is busy defending the Department of Justice against Concord's motion for an order to show cause why the DoJ should not answer for felony jury/trial tampering - the Mueller Report! But then, without a bond it makes sense that she would turn Defense Attorney for the DoJ as pet "judge" of a non-President/businessman.
You can't make this stuff up!
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules