Thanks Lorne; nice Catch. I like when folks pay attention to the detail.Originally Posted by lorne
I am presuming you mean Star Chamber. This is also trustee of the resulting trust.
The baser interpretation would be that whoever holds the force gets to be king. He who wears the robe is judge de facto in command of the sheriff. We have a suitor like that. He dealt in guns for a living and when contesting a foreclosure challenged the "judge" jurisdiction. The judge sent him out of her courtroom and so he was headed for the clerks office to conclude business and the sheriff deputies arrested him for contempt, pretending the judge had the authority to send him from the courthouse, not her courtroom.
Sooner than try staying out of prison for the phony felony charges he gave up his business dealing guns. He kept saying, She will throw me in prison.
The Star Chamber had execution right over the sovereign.
But that does not mean there is nothing to be learned from the Michael DOUGLAS movie by that name.
Timing tells me that the thread is brought up regarding my patent. Something I have always pondered is how I managed never to directly Refuse for Cause Robert J. BRYAN for his oath:
It sure looks like I did; maybe the clerk removed it from the Doc? Look how there are no PACER markings.
All in all though when it came to publishing the Notice of Misdeed regarding the Trust, how the phony process never effected the irrevocable trust, the Doc(s) were published by BRYAN from chambers. Like the clerk is not familiar with the law. So I see why I have not "recused" or otherwise rejected his de facto authority but it seems logical I would have been conscious of it at the time in 2017.
The journey is truly amazing!!
Reply With Quote