Exactly what does the IRS agent think?

[David Merrill]

Yes! That's very good. But I was referring to the phone call clip you provided. How can that IRS agent just say that they don't process anything with the Demand for Lawful Money verbiage? Are they now sending FrivPen letters to anyone who files a Lawful Money return? I guess I am wondering if there is a solid way to fight against a FrivPen letter if one receives it after having filed a Lawful Money return. I'm still new to all this....

The refusal for cause properly published stays progress. I have mentioned that the Albany Remand is under attack; that KAHN is doing his best to end the evidence repository at over 100 Docs, most of them Refusals for Cause.

However there are some very convincing success stories that requesting a formal assessment or audit, with the participation of the subject "taxpayer" will induce an honest refund. This plays on the right to be heard. The response to the IRS Letter is to engage the agent to continue evaluation of the tax liability.

[David Merrill]

How can that IRS agent just say that they don't process anything with the Demand for Lawful Money verbiage?

That was a phone conversation. The Lesson Plan:

• true identity
• record forming - Refusal for Cause
• redeeming lawful money

This includes being on the brain trust. Here is some recent Crosstalk.

Especially Step 2 - that is where I teach a suitor how to express redemption in terms the IRS attorney understands. Very effective.

Are they now sending FrivPen letters to anyone who files a Lawful Money return?

Just about anybody who is redeeming lawful money is aware of me and how to get communications going. So I have to say that almost every FrivPen on this kind of income tax return comes to my attention. There have only been about ten FrivPens throughout my entire journey drafting remedy. There is always a problem with the return and I help spot it and we correct it. We invariably refuse the FrivPen presentment for cause.

In the Albany Remand there was one suitor who was signing "Without Prejudice" - a patriot dreg. I kept missing it and it developed but since we corrected his R4C process he has received the forgiveness letter.

[ag maniac]

Yes! That's very good. But I was referring to the phone call clip you provided. How can that IRS agent just say that they don't process anything with the Demand for Lawful Money verbiage? Are they now sending FrivPen letters to anyone who files a Lawful Money return? I guess I am wondering if there is a solid way to fight against a FrivPen letter if one receives it after having filed a Lawful Money return. I'm still new to all this....

DM offers some sage advice -- TAKE IT TO HEART -- requesting a formal assessment or audit, with the participation of the subject "taxpayer" will induce an honest refund. This plays on the right to be heard. The response to the IRS Letter is to engage the agent to continue evaluation of the tax liability.


Used to have a suitor here "Martin earl"....give a read to his posts in the following link.....DON'T BE AFRAID....YOU'RE IN THE RIGHT !!

http://savingtosuitorsclub.net/showthread.php?1405-Get-Your-Billions-Back-America-2014&p=24356&viewfull=1#post24356

[xparte]

I am never surprised when i visit this site and that fishing discourse better known as The lesson plan a lesson plan or lessened up. Verbatim Employment its a form of commerce you is per / forming or acting like a federally formed employee onlyjust a Me can demand only a you gets the benefits from the privateers IRS internally you service to say agents. How verbally speaking is just volunteered information. Verbiage its legally binding standing and style demanding lawfully requires its own statutory style No agents for this station or office can give Me legal advice. Becoming your own agent with the lesson plan . Two distinctions i did it myself and i have donated a portion to (express redemption in terms of my own gratuitous benefit) Or having the distinction of becoming a suitor and expressing satisfaction or disappointment in being taught some expressed benevolence . I am suggesting if your worries are formed you've already expressed deferral . I however have no distinctions on benevolence if sharing is done privately thats distinct if its a I am wondering if there is a solid way to fight against a FrivPen letter if one receives it after having filed a Lawful Money return. I'm still new to all this.. i distinctly see a private message as the expressive method for discourse. DBA vs DBOTP on the phone a true name isn't identified on a Business # Tax player payer slayer why talk to anyone its FrivPho calls

[David Merrill]

I am never surprised when i visit this site and that fishing discourse better known as The lesson plan a lesson plan or lessened up. Verbatim Employment its a form of commerce you is per / forming or acting like a federally formed employee onlyjust a Me can demand only a you gets the benefits from the privateers IRS internally you service to say agents. How verbally speaking is just volunteered information. Verbiage its legally binding standing and style demanding lawfully requires its own statutory style No agents for this station or office can give Me legal advice. Becoming your own agent with the lesson plan . Two distinctions i did it myself and i have donated a portion to (express redemption in terms of my own gratuitous benefit) Or having the distinction of becoming a suitor and expressing satisfaction or disappointment in being taught some expressed benevolence . I am suggesting if your worries are formed you've already expressed deferral . I however have no distinctions on benevolence if sharing is done privately thats distinct if its a I am wondering if there is a solid way to fight against a FrivPen letter if one receives it after having filed a Lawful Money return. I'm still new to all this.. i distinctly see a private message as the expressive method for discourse. DBA vs DBOTP on the phone a true name isn't identified on a Business # Tax player payer slayer why talk to anyone its FrivPho calls

I think sometimes after all these years I might be the best ever at interpreting xPartese. You got me this time.

P.S. It is like instead of a spellchecker you downloaded a wordscrambler.

[xparte]

When the wisdom gets imparted or impaired ? When our strength compliments us the compassion for a weaknesses sustains us. Its a small justice Just /us gringo

[David Merrill]

evolving devolvements

The debt scavenger most reliably goes silent in the face of a proper Refusal for Cause.



Notice how there is no return address anywhere, making a proper R4C difficult to the novice at redemption.



This suitor knows who to notify, his Refusal for Cause:



It is always the municipal office in charge, as the judiciary is a farce. STEWART, not KAHN.

[David Merrill]

W-4 Changes

One suitor has received, or rather his employer has, a Lock-In Letter demanding a certain amount of withholdings.

This is inconsequential as the money will be refunded pursuant to law. The suitor led me to an interesting link:

Withholdings 2020.

[David Merrill]

On the W-4 front;

The IRS waited until 12/4 to supply us with the new W-4 Form for 2021. They prepared us with a draft though:



Last year, for 2019, the W-4 Form was obscured about conditions for writing in "EXEMPT".

To be clear about the attached returns, the suitor filed 130 days ago, both state and federal but did not put any demand on the state (CA) return. Line 58. So the IRS went silent and sent in the state, returning a $500 refund instead of the withholdings of over $7K. The $500 refund is refused for cause.

For the full explanation - stay tuned to this thread. Or check into my Lesson Plan ($2K) if you need some guidance. There is no need to involve your employer at all. Any IRS agent can call your employer and start a fight without any paper at all - a fight that will get you fired. Nasty business! If the IRS compels withholdings just consider it a savings account until you can file your return.

[David Merrill]

To follow up on this, I filed my TY2019 lawful money tax return on paper and left the question at the top of Schedule 1 blank:
At any time during 2019, did you receive, sell, send, exchange, or otherwise acquire any financial interest in any virtual currency?

Didn't answer it at all and yet I did receive my tax refund as requested. So it appears answering that question was voluntary after all, and TurboTax just decided to make the answer required when it really isn't.

That is great! I am copying this over to What Does the IRS Agent Really Think?

[David Merrill]

Here is a form for people who were redeeming but filed as endorser. Frivolous Return Program law.

An untimely claim for a refund/abatement on a non-frivolous Form 843 is received.

Note: To be considered timely, taxpayer must file a claim for a refund on Form 843 within 3 years from the time a return associated with the penalty is filed or 2 years from the date the penalty was paid, whichever period expires later.

Here is the link at the IRS.

[David Merrill]

calculated contemplation

This letter followed a delayed refund of withholdings.

I think it prudent to Refuse for Cause the form letter since it specifies that the income is taxable interest.


P.S. I am confused about the phone camera angle:



Yeah. That's better!

[David Merrill]

Professional Example

Mr. PAZ (818) 743-8890 is geared up with an online redemption tax accountant service. He gets consistent results.

Attached find the only exception - but look at Page 4 - he is bringing redemption to the DEATH PROMISE. Quite literally that means death promise.

MORTGAGE

Remember that debt (death) and redemption (life) are mutually exclusive ultimates. Where there is one, the other does not exist.

[shikamaru]

Mr. PAZ (818) 743-8890 is geared up with an online redemption tax accountant service. He gets consistent results.

Attached find the only exception - but look at Page 4 - he is bringing redemption to the DEATH PROMISE. Quite literally that means death promise.

MORTGAGE

Remember that debt (death) and redemption (life) are mutually exclusive ultimates. Where there is one, the other does not exist.

A mortgage is a "dead pledge". It is property that produces income, but the income proceeds go to the creditor without buying down the debt.

Redemption is the buying back of the pledge (property).

In medieval times, the title of the property would change hands from debtor to creditor with clauses in the contract allowing the debtor to redeem the property from the creditor.

[David Merrill]

A mortgage is a "dead pledge". It is property that produces income, but the income proceeds go to the creditor without buying down the debt.

Redemption is the buying back of the pledge (property).

In medieval times, the title of the property would change hands from debtor to creditor with clauses in the contract allowing the debtor to redeem the property from the creditor.

Very good explanation. Wonderful!

In conjunction with bottomry and Rules of Admiralty we can get a rounded portrait of central banking. Plus the Bretton Woods Agreements, SDR's and the Amendments all point us to understand the role of War and Emergency with martial rule.