Quote Originally Posted by Chex View Post
shift tense and person, learn something new everyday, thank you

I put that question out there because some person authorized deductions from a friend’s paycheck without this personam signing a w4 form.

Therefore if you non-endorse the paycheck why not the w4 form as confirmation?

I’m taking a shot at this, so is this "against the person" similar to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure- Rule B(1)(a)? This might have no relationship at all it’s just the way I associated it.

I don’t understand what the meaning of “contain a prayer for process” suggests.

After I read Rule C(3)(a)(ii) from this I wanted to know if exigent circumstance exists and again if its related.

I’ve also noticed that the paycheck is always addressed to the true name of the recipient not to the corporate person.
Buy a stamp - put it on your signature as part of your signature. W-4 included.

That last sentence does not jibe for me. The paycheck is almost always written to the legal or full name.

"They shall be redeemed in lawful money on demand..."


If you want to integrate that into the Admiralty Rules go ahead. That sounds like a fun academic experience but you may create some complicated mental models that are more a headache than practicable. If you execute simply you probably will need not explore into such sophisticated elaboration.


Regards,

David Merrill.