Objections to Fingerprinting at Governmnet Offices

[shikamaru]

I have not made my mind one way or the other. I do think however that there is a way to get these benefits, being that they are facilitated by USDA (at the federal level) but given out at the state level. There has to be a way to state one's objection to fingerprinting solely based on the fact that they are not required in 45 states or so, and have this objection held up. I do need some case law on this though.

Then if you need case law, you need to go to the law library.
Also if it means that much to ya, take it to court, but make sure to suffer the injury first.
In my opinion, you'll waste your time, but hey I can't fault someone for fighting for their beliefs.

I know you cannot be of help, hence I asked for some other people to respond. I understand that it makes you feel good to state things like "You can't get both benefits and rights" and other things commonly used by freedom loving people, but I think it is out of place here. That is not to say that generally speaking that is not true or should be taken into consideration.
Thus, I would appreciate it if you let other people with more substantive information to weigh in.

I know you aren't listening. I understand your mind is made up and unable to take in substantive information.
"You can't get both benefits and rights" is not what I typed. If you are going to cite me, at least cite me verbatim.
If you cite like the above in documents, expect to be shot down quickly.

I'm not blocking anyone from posting.

Or are you just trying to post as much as possible and be involved in almost every thread and be the #1 poster as you were on SJC?

This hardly qualifies as a proper sentence let alone a substantive inquiry.

Persons who desire welfare benefits aren't typically sojourners to a board such as this.