Remember I put forward the term for cause.
I'm well aware of how jurisprudence is defined.
This is good. We are in agreement that philosophy is involved.
While you have espoused yours. I'm showing you their philosophy and definitions
By the by, you should cite the source(s) from whence this information comes unless it is your organic writings.
For your perusal:
Six Books of the Commonwealth by Jean Bodin
That which I present doesn't mean it is my personal endorsement.
I realize that much of this material is propaganda such as
The Federalist Papers.
Many times by force followed by custom and habit.
Two senses here.
Freemen as has been historically defined.
Freemen as to one's personal philosophy.
What you are not considering is my philosophy that one must know a system quite thoroughly before you can hack that system.
That philosophy has worked out smashingly well for me in a multitude of areas i.e. computers and law for starters.
It behooves anyone to know their adversary.