Dishonor Disqualifies the “UST’s” Claims of Authority and Jurisdiction

[David Merrill]

I find this interesting. Though it seems an impossible
task getting everyone to think like this; not that it's
our job, but imagine the world we'd live in if a majority
of people actually understood this...and applied it?

Instead, you could guarantee they'd argue vociferously
against this concept - the power of a 'good' public
(ed)indoctrination will not be denied!

I am enjoying this thread too!

It is good to understand trusts in terms and definitions I agree. But that takes a lot of time and reading. I think it beneficial then to consider trust as a noun and a verb at the same time. I always apply my understanding to redeeming lawful money and endorsement - trust in the Fed; or non-endorsement, avoiding that trust.

I think you have captured the intent of True Name though. The basis of any relationship in trust is always the parties being stable. Relationship is one to another.