A4v

[allodial]

I think you have a very important point BY;


Accept for Value is only applicable to a bond under a valid security agreement. Either it pertains to commercial instruments or Oaths of Office. The wayward Patriot Movement has tried to apply it to Oaths jammed down the official's throat by negative averment. Dan PETERSEN was released briefly under close supervision and landed himself back in prison quickly under the 2007 Court Security laws prohibiting bogus liens against officials.

The kind of lien might also be important. If one is underwriting the office/person one might have to a bailor-bailee type of interest rather than a debtor-creditor type interest. In other words, seems one has to know what one is doing. That a "Dan PETERSEN" was filling liens is telling. Residents and persons might have to tread carefully.

Acceptance of an oath of office is not the same as acceptance of an oath of office for value. Acceptance of an oath of office is something that a king might do with respect to, say, a man taking office as a Governor-General or as a Registrar. "Acceptance for value" has to do with drafts or demands for money being made against the acceptor.