What I am doing here is commenting on the quotes taken from the pages of Libel in Review to show some similarities and insights to Coresource methodology found:
page 12
CS Voice: ( Paper sliding the authenticated BC) The person is here in special appearance for deposit to owner, I trust the court will settle this matter honorably, I am ineligible for these benefits.litigant is not knowledgeable of the law and relies upon the full discretion of the court to apply justice fairly and evenly
page 11
CS sample language written on presentment already handled by a clerk of court:This is not a tax being deposited into the Treasury, but part of the obligations of the fund to defer the quota imposed by the IMF on the United States by agreement
(have a copy of presentment and copy of proof of service on hand ready to give to bailiff)
page 6
to avoid subjecting an in-rem party to the jurisdiction of the court with reference to other claims for which such process is not availableCS Voice:a party discovers he has had no proper notice
I do not consent to be recognized by this name as I was not properly noticed, I am here as an invited guest to correct a mistake and help the court settle this matter. You have permission (license without liability) to call me Envoy or friend.
page 4
CS Voice: If this living soul is no longer needed for actions to benefit this court, I will be leaving now.when a statute of the United States provides, an action for the use or benefit of another shall be brought in the name of the United States.
That is all I have for now, something else might pop in my head about this at a later time, but see if any of this looks interesting to you, maybe help simplify your approach as a suitor.