Quote Originally Posted by David Merrill View Post
That setting will work well for most people. However Google is so dominant a search engine there will be a lot of people who have registered for a free gmail.com email address and have forgotten. Those are the class who will not be able to access your docs on that setting AJ. If they do not remember their password, they will be called upon to login to see the document. I am using Public to anybody on the Web.

You have done an excellent job of refining the Coupon Redemption document. Assuming you worked on it. Which is like with me; people think that is my work but I heard the suitor who hired me got it from Rick ERTYL. I heard Rick wrote up the first draft and apparently, not to criticize, his word processing skills were just plain poor. Assuming Rick has a mastery of spoken English, he may be a high-school dropout. I am not saying that to be insulting - it is just that the suitor needed to hire me; or anybody with grammar and word processing skills just to finish the Coupon Redemption technique on paper. It is Rick's intellectual property as I understand it.

It would be a masterpiece in its original form if there were in fact funds setting in the mythical Treasury Direct or STRAWMAN SSN accounts based in HJR-192 or whatever. It would be terrific if there were because you could literally pay any bill simply by referring the bill collector to the Treasury like that. Go get your money over at my back-room account with the Treasury!

There is a consistent money-mechanism related to the creation of credit though, that can arise from this coupon redemption method though. Setoff. The bill collector will consistently acknowledge that the debt has been setoff to zero - that the account has been zeroed out.

This setoff must be combined with the techniques of being a suitor, proper record-forming and knowledge of money, responsibility and proper timely response, or the bills continue and your credit rating will be affected, and possibly liens may arise affecting your property. In other words, the zeroing of your account is fleeting. It is a requirement of law that you get that setoff in writing in the process, it would seem. I recall when playing with the technique, the attorneys for the debt collectors would play several different games; the most common one was to zero the account for "Ten Days" awaiting your response. This way Refusal for Cause could be interpreted that you were refusing Setoff, not that they would begin billing again in ten days...

One suitor was going to develop the document into a business plan and so we set him up for a firmly documented setoff for his Example. But he had some health troubles that caused him to drive to the wrong city for filing, a misjudgment caused by pain and at a timing in his crisis that he never got the plan back on its feet. He is better now though.

The suitor should be able to spot the Setoff and get that into an evidence repository, forming the Record around it. Then one can use it to keep liens from developing or being enforced. One can use the Setoff to clean up the credit report but most take my addition (the last paragraph added to Rick's work) seriously. If you say what you say on the Coupon Redemption remittance, then you can no longer get credit under the influence of fraud anyway. If you sign for credit, even endorsement on the back of your paycheck you go in eyes wide open. Your confession about understanding to be the secured party to any credit is now on paper! In other words, this process changes your credit life permanently.



Regards,

David Merrill.
That's right, no NEW signature loans or credit cards should be applied for after such a declaration is made. I have decided to no longer pursue any NEW agreements or contracts of that sort.

The point is that the creation and the issuance of a coupon by the entity in question is for the purposes of non-disclosed double enrichment; they actually may get paid twice: by your check and by the filled out coupon which is decribed IN THEIR OWN LAW as being an obligation of the United States just like a stack of FRNs. Since they generated this instrument, they must have knowledge of its nature and utilization. Handing in a stack of FRNs is still not actually PAYING the debt until the United States makes good on that paper; it is a United States' obligation to fulfill that promise to PAY. In the meantime debts are discharged with the hope that God will restore the balances (In God We Trust) and the United States will satisfy its responsibility in the future.

According to their own law, a coupon is no different than an FRN. If it was generated by an entity with authority to do so, then that entity is the obligatory party which must accept it for what it is (legal tender of payment) and the United States is the debtor with the obligation to make good on it. I just refuse to offer my substance behind their scheme and instruct them to utilize their instrument to settle their account; an account I no longer lend my energy to, now that I have become aware of the truth.