I'm trying to obtain a broadcast of his and James Montgomery that occurred live this past Saturday.Originally Posted by Life's-a-Psyop
This should suffice in the meantime: http://savingtosuitorsclub.net/showt...light=Informer
I'm trying to obtain a broadcast of his and James Montgomery that occurred live this past Saturday.
This should suffice in the meantime: http://savingtosuitorsclub.net/showt...light=Informer
He gives cites.
If you ask me nicely, I may give them to you.
My awesomeness.
This is not a court, motla.
Courts have their customs and practices that are their norms.
I'll humor you. I'd use their resources. There is more than enough to successfully administrate one's claims IF one enters that forum.
The wise administrator is the one who avoids controversy and can end controversies before they rise to the level of a hearing.
I will save you the hassle of listening to a whole mp3, I do not think the informer was the first to say that, he just repeating what was heard or seen elsewhere.
It is much better to go right to the source.
user fees
An excise tax, often in the form of a license or supplemental charge, levied to fund a public service.
http://www.irs.gov/app/understanding...t/glossary.jsp
"You have to understand Neo, most of these people are not ready to
be unplugged, and many of them are so inured, so hopelessly dependent on the system, that they will fight to protect it."
~ Morpheus / The Matrix movie trilogy.
Yes, that fantastic Informer thread, you put together, has plenty of food for thought right now.
No thank you, got bigger fish to contend with.He gives cites.
If you ask me nicely, I may give them to you.
My awesomeness
This is not a court, motla.
Courts have their customs and practices that are their norms.
I'll humor you. I'd use their resources. There is more than enough to successfully administrate one's claims IF one enters that forum.
The wise administrator is the one who avoids controversy and can end controversies before they rise to the level of a hearing.
yes, that profile was overdue being updated, guess we think alike in that respect.
Suppose we were able to make that claim without entering their forum?
Ditto in avoidance. This also applies to not using any case cites, man's statutes, regulations or policies. The simplification of it is just calling things for what they are.. i.e. not consenting to a offer to act as surety for an unvalidated claim. Fight and they got you in the cross hairs.
Affidavits are negative averments therefor affidavits are for subjects, Declarations and Petitions however is for those with incompetence to stand under their courts and that is not a bad thing to say.
"You have to understand Neo, most of these people are not ready to
be unplugged, and many of them are so inured, so hopelessly dependent on the system, that they will fight to protect it."
~ Morpheus / The Matrix movie trilogy.
I'll continue adding to it as I dig up more good stuff
EZrythm would like me to show you why that affidavit is useless and will more than likely prove an attempt at tax fraud?
They will use that affidavit against you.
"The Informer's" opinion was that income tax was a "use and transfer" fee on FRNs.
I remember that webpage on that.
Key word right there......."opinion".
And we have demonstrable proof it is a use tax on FRNs. It's clear to me that "jesse james" is a tax attorney.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote