It's funny you went through the commotion of learning how to ATTACH and then you PASTED.Originally Posted by itsmymoney
It's funny you went through the commotion of learning how to ATTACH and then you PASTED.
Johnny, it certainly wasn't a 'commotion', it was just easier to paste it into the post. I duly noted how to attach a document in my notes, graciously provided by member 'ag maniac'.
Not sure why you made it a point to mention this.
You're not sure, but I know why you mentioned my mention of it. I notice things; little things; your tokens.
Since you made your demand for lawful money, the bank cannot fractionally lend on those deposits & you owe no income tax on those deposits. You're all set. Thank you for helping us Run the Fed!
Last edited by JohnnyCash; 01-04-15 at 06:10 AM.
Johnny, I'm still not sure what you are getting at. What do you mean by, 'I notice things; little things; your tokens'? Are you insinuating something?
Here's what I am getting at, the bottom line if you will:
1) I made a lawful money demand in 2013 (see Treasury Letter Affidavit below, recorded at County) of which references mostly if not all NET pay transactions.
2) I RILM every check for 2013 and 2014 with the standard 12 USC 411 novation on the back only.
3) Filing late for 2013 and current for 2014, I wanted to take the lawful money deduction for both years.
4) After posting to this thread with regards to the Supporting Schedule and how to 'fill it out', Doug555 mentioned that this might not be a wise idea, given my basically 'NET PAY' demand in my Treasury Letter (below). This is because the GROSS Pay is the payment for any taxable event, i.e. being an "employee" and earning "wages" (we're all coerced into that, but whatever). Bottom line: my demand was not for 'ALL transactions'.
5) You made a statement to the effect of (paraphrasing), "take your lawful money demand; the IRS won't want to deal with it". Your statement was posed in general, not in response to anything I posted or to me personally. However, I was curious that your statement was somewhat in conflict with Doug555's warning to me due to my 'empty' Affidavit demand (it does not demand lawful money on ALL transactions - i.e. GROSS and Net pay, withdrawals, etc).
So given my track record with 6702 penalties (i.e. 'tax protestor label'), I was wary in utilizing the lawful money reduction for 2013 and 2014, based on Doug555's warning. I have since filed 'normal' for 2013 (I had to, given other circumstances) and I am planning to do the same for 2014. Going forward, I will record my 'all transactions' Affidavit as soon as I see the recent deposit in my next bank statement. I will feel comfortable taking the deduction for 2015 when I file in 2016 because I am now using the 'all transactions' language on the FRONT of the check/deposit slip.
So my general question to you was, how do you feel about what Doug555 stated (it's 'iffy' to use the deduction relative to my situation) vs. what you stated in general ("go for it, they won't touch it"). I'm not asking for advice. I just thought there was some conflict there, especially from well-respected suitors where I thought comments from you would be beneficial to the discussion in this regard.
Regards,
imm
02/19/2013
Prepared by, and Return to:
‘imm’
Department of the Treasury
1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20220*
Attn: Secretary of the Treasury
Re: Lawful Money Demand
Dear Secretary of the Treasury,
THIS IS NOTICE TO ONE AND ALL that I, ‘imm’, a man, hereby make a DEMAND FOR LAWFUL MONEY pursuant to Title 12 USC 411 for redeeming all monies that are deposited into and withdrawn from any bank or depository institution, as performed by me or for me; hereinafter ‘events’.
Events include but are not limited to the following: direct-deposit from any company paying me in such manner; check cashing or deposit; cash deposits; bank cards; ATM; debits or withdrawals or payments; electronic transfers, or any other means relating to all accounts I have at any financial institution subject to the Federal Reserve Act. Said events are subject to a superseding DEMAND FOR LAWFUL MONEY with the express intent to redeem any private credit instrument into lawful money pursuant to, albeit absent any benefit or privilege from, Title 12 Section 411 of the United States Code.
This demand is made pursuant to law binding all parties subject to Section 16 of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, now codified at Title 12 United States § 411. This demand is made for the express purpose of exercising my remedy under the law and to rebut the false and presumptive notion that I voluntarily endorse the private credit of the Federal Reserve. I expressly do not endorse private Federal Reserve credit in any form.
This Notice also applies retroactively to any existing accounts I have at any institution subject to the Federal Reserve Act. It was only by fraudulent omission that I was prevented from invoking the remedy available within 12 USC §411 from the start of any relationship I have made with any financial institution subject to the Federal Reserve Act.
Any current or previous contractual obligation I may have made due to the fraudulent omission of the remedy found in Title 12 USC §411 is unequivocally subordinate to this Notice and Demand letter, and, shall not be construed to modify any provision contained within this Notice and Demand letter.
I declare under penalty of perjury of the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct.
________________________________
‘imm’ – All rights reserved
These hip waders need way more room in the crotchal area. Is it me, or are the fish just not biting today?
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote