"ID scans for beer" - A Note On Buying Adult Beverages

[walter]

Its not about the age its about them knowing who you are.
In Canada I was even told this buy security at a outdoor concert beer garden.
Everyone must have 2 ID's to get in even if you are a 100 years old.

They claim the "Act" was created to ID gang members in nightclubs to stop gang violence.
I have used non-government issued ID to enter nightclubs that had no date of birth on it and it was accepted.
A few times I got in by just saying I don't have any and I stand staring in their eyes.

In California I had store mangers refuse Canadian government issued ID for beer.
Claiming only California issued ID is accepted. A joke. These people are close to retarded in IQ's.

18 was the legal age to drink where I was born.
What gets me with the 21 year old age limit on drinking in the US is that you can join the army and kill people years before you are allowed to have a beer. That is very disturbing.

[allodial]

Its not about the age its about them knowing who you are.

Its about knowing where you are and what you do and who you are with and perhaps also knowing if you are bonded or not (DL = bond). Additionally, it might be a check to see if you are a "legal entity" for insurance purposes. Either way: to feed Skynet. How do you know the ID scanner isn't made to transmit to the local cellular network or to satellites what it scanned? The cops when they radio in information about people they pull over have been known to do so IN THE CLEAR SO ANYONE WITH A CHEAP SCANNER CAN OBTAIN SUFFICIENT INFO FOR IDENTITY THEFT (Name, DOB, address, license number, SSN). That is why the whole online ID protection is joke of jokes. Who do you think the main perpetrators of identity theft are? Its not the general public that has access to all of that information its mainly the police and banks.

IEveryone must have 2 ID's to get in even if you are a 100 years old. ... They claim the "Act" was created to ID gang members in nightclubs to stop gang violence.

The point of the "wave of migrants" and allowing "illegals" over the border is to give rise to justification of needing ID so they know who is who. The mingling of ex-convicts and criminals with the general non-criminal populations (ala parole, progressive softness policies, etc.) serves the same function. The presumption with illegals is that might be fugitives from other countries (so you see the same thing causes a cross border problem). Of course if the death penalty was still in effect for stealing, embezzlement, rape, murder, etc. there wouldn't be much question--as in, if the criminal was dead we could presume those cross borders or the guy and gal walking down the street at 1 a.m. not to be be fugitives or ex-convicts who perpetrated murder or felony theft [they would be dead not walking down the street] so the it would matter a lot less.

So this fancy ID system becomes a "solution" for making distinctions between who is who. Sure a correction system is nice in theory, but what is correcting, healing or remedial about exposing even non-violent men to rape, disease, violence and cruelty in jails or prisons? Michael Vick was harangued for involvement in dog fighting. But most all of the 50 States encourage the same thing with humans and even go further with rape, forced sodomy and spread of disease. What the hell is that? Is that government?

IMHO the general presumption should be that if someone isn't in prison they ought not be in prison. But instead, they presume that anyone could potentially be someone that escaped Prison XYZ three days ago or that anyone could be an illegal if they look this way or that way or he or she might be on parole and the cop is looking to make an arrest or do something to prove his usefulness to his bosses. Sadly the system operates on a negative presumption which is only possible because of progressive politics that puts mingles the criminals and terrorists with innocent, good folk (all skin colors).

Lynching someone for the color of their skin is absolutely disdainful and unlawful in any case. I'm referring to capital punishment subsequent to lawful trials.

The "Problem-Reaction-Solution" paradigm misses the first step "zero": Create the problem.

CREATE THE PROBLEM
0-A. Abolish capital punishment and allow for "super liberal" policies. Establish a "corrections system" that disgustingly promotes rape and violence in jails which is utter failure and dereliction of duty on the part of peace officers (if you cannot house prisoners safely then the non-violent offenders at the least should be dismissed, no or you should simply not have a prison if you are not competent to run it).

0-B. Allow those who who suffered from cruel and unusual punishment (felons and non-felons) who may suffer much mental and emotional defects or traumas because of their jail experiences (and who strongly believe themselves to have a justification for hating the society that treated them to such an experience) in general to mingle among innocent folks so you cant tell who is who. Sometimes "crimes" are committed out of necessity because of rote oppression. Often, however for petty or unnecessary reasons. Among some "gangster types" (Black, White, Jewish or Italian--whatever label they may wear) simply saying "your wife is ugly" is sufficient justification for a hit. But yet the same will hire a lawyer who will plea against the "dark ages" of the death penalty for the same people who doled out the death penalty without much thought about it except "you insulted them so you must die". The same would think blasphemy laws in the Bible to be "antiquated".

The hypocrisy and schizoid double talk is: stinky.

The same "gangster" will want mercy should he be arrested with blood and evidence dripping from his hands.

Note that the women who would have been put to death for adultery or for other things are having a field day. The same women mind you wouldn't hesitate to have a guy beat to death or shot should he hurt her feelings so save the 'bleeding heart' deception for someone else. I witnessed things like this first hand. I have witness a "good White woman" (sarcasm) have her sons beat a White kid nearly to death only because of an insult --and then they lied said "A big Black guy knocked him out and he went that way." {From observation I'd tend to say that crime statistics are skewed against Blacks mostly because of lies. Now if first innocent Black guy they pick up should resist the arrest after his long day of work and not having any clue what nonsense the cops were on, it would be in the news with the cop saying "he was so big and strong and scared me so I shot him"? But what about how scared the guy was who they picked on for no reason? That is wrong and its the stuff of bad, bad Karma that is working its way back around to its point of causality.} Almost every man she knows thinks she is pure and innocent and good country girl. She is well-versed in duplicity. She would promote the liberal ideology of freedom for women but she easily doled out the death penalty as if she were judge-God and jury all rolled into one. If you think she is a rarity ->

.

[KEK = LOL]

Heav'n has no Rage, like Love to Hatred turn'd, Nor Hell a Fury, like a Woman scorn'd. --From The Mourning Bride (Act III, Scene 2) by William Congreve.

Sure these days according to "popular consensus" its "old fashioned" and "antiquated" and "dark ages" to burn or hang a woman for adultery or to lynch someone for stealing. But vengeance hits/killings initiated by emotionally hurt females (even if she Karmically deserves it) aren't? Wuuut!?!? Hanging someone for stealing a car is "old fashioned" but the same "gangster" or "cooldude" or "cowboy" (White or Black) might blow your fsck-ing head off for putting a dent in his car.

PROBLEM
1. The criminally minded realize they are "invisible" and can go about doing things "as long as they can get away with it". Feral women no longer restrained by a higher power feminize their sons which promote a society of duplicity and deception. The crime rate and the oppression unbearable. The residents (especially feral women) realizing that if they are clever enough can get away with murder because the system is seen by them to be soft and weak. Crime rate goes through the roof.

REACTION
2. The "citizenry" gets irate over the crime rate (which they caused by embracing self-destructive progressive policies) and demands something be done.

SOLUTION
3. The legislatures and citizenry that caused #1 require everyone to have ID as a solution to the problem that they caused in the first place by failing their duties at #0-A & #0-B.



Women's lib and destruction of the family took full swing in the 70s. A stronger detachment from Christian or Biblical moral basis in the United States pop culture began (in the late 60s and) took stronger hold in the mid to late 80s and early 90s. Major prisons construction started in the mid 90s. Introduction of the Beatles and subliminal-message laced music was said to be PSYOPS waged against Americans.


Crimes occurring in jails or prison are sadly probably not even part of general crime reports.