Good point there IMM, I am just enjoying the jurisdiction subject and getting a better grasp on it
Federal Power Limited
The fiction, "that because it was an excise tax, it was legal," is not true. The power of the federal government is limited to its own property, as stated in Article I, Section 8, Clause 17, and to "regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian tribes;" as stated in Article I, Section 8, Clause 3. 18 U.S.C., Section 921, Definitions, states,
"The term 'interstate or foreign commerce' includes commerce between any place in a State and any place outside that State, or within any possession of the United States (not including the Canal Zone) or the District of Columbia, but such term does not include commerce between places within the same State but through any place outside of that State. The term 'State' includes the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the possessions of the United States (not including the Canal Zone)."
Only employees of the federal government, residents of the District of Columbia, residents of naval bases, residents of forts, U.S. citizens of the Virgin Islands, Puerto Rico, territories, and insular possessions were lawfully required to file and pay the Victory Tax.
I think this is where MJ states "you" must understand "Trust Law" ?
In 1953, the United States relinquished its control over the Philippines.
Why do the Philippine pure Trusts #1 (customsduties) and
#2 (internal revenue) continue to be administered today?
Who are the Settlers of the Trusts?
What is done with the funds in the Trusts?
What businesses, if any, do these Trusts operate?
Who are the Beneficiaries?
Coincidentally, on July 9, 1953, the Secretary of the Treasury, G. K. Humphrey, by "virtue of the authority vested in me," changed the name of the Bureau of the Internal Revenue, BIR, to Internal Revenue Service when he signed what is now Treasury Order 150-06.
TREASURY ORDER: 150-06 Page Content
SUBJECT: Designation as Internal Revenue Service
CANCELLATION DATE: August 22, 2005
REASON FOR CANCELLATION: TO 150-06, dated July 9, 1953. The entity formerly known as the Bureau of Internal Revenue would be known as the Internal Revenue Service. TO 150-06 is cancelled
http://www.treasury.gov/about/role-o.../to150-06.aspx
This was an obvious attempt to legitimize the Bureau of Internal Revenue.
Without the approval of Congress or the President, Humphrey, without any legal authority, tried to turn a pure trust into an agency of the Department of the Treasury.
Treasury Decision 2313 Under Internal Revenue Laws of the United States
Even Pete. I have come to a more forgiving perspective, and no longer believe that anyone who has vigorously deployed the edited TD 2313 is guilty of deliberate fraud or ill-intent After all, the actual text of TD 2313 not only does not support the point for which the edited portion is presented, but does, in fact, discredit the entire 'argument' on behalf of which that edited portion is used.
http://www.losthorizons.com/tax/Misu...ngs/TD2313.htm
Know Your identity “Nonresident aliens are not entitled to the specific exemption designated in paragraph C of the income-tax law, but are liable for the normal and additional tax upon the entire net income "from all property owned, and of every business, trade, or profession carried on in the United States," computed upon the basis prescribed in the law.”
T.D. 2313 is crucial evidence proving that the income tax provisions of the IRC are municipal law, with no territorial jurisdiction inside the 50 States of the Union. The U.S. Secretary of the Treasury who approved T.D. 2313 had no authority to extend the holding in the Brushaber case to anyone or anything not a proper Party to that court action.
Originally Posted by Chex
Good point there IMM, I am just enjoying the jurisdiction subject and getting a better grasp on it
Reply With Quote
