Results 1 to 10 of 258

Thread: Exactly what does the IRS agent think?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Quote Originally Posted by David Merrill View Post
    Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars is fictional, but based in real and substantial psychology. It tells of the Elite and Illuminati conjuring macroeconomics hidden in a little calculus. So I worked it out.
    Yes! That's very good. But I was referring to the phone call clip you provided. How can that IRS agent just say that they don't process anything with the Demand for Lawful Money verbiage? Are they now sending FrivPen letters to anyone who files a Lawful Money return? I guess I am wondering if there is a solid way to fight against a FrivPen letter if one receives it after having filed a Lawful Money return. I'm still new to all this....

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by modnyc3 View Post
    Yes! That's very good. But I was referring to the phone call clip you provided. How can that IRS agent just say that they don't process anything with the Demand for Lawful Money verbiage? Are they now sending FrivPen letters to anyone who files a Lawful Money return? I guess I am wondering if there is a solid way to fight against a FrivPen letter if one receives it after having filed a Lawful Money return. I'm still new to all this....
    The refusal for cause properly published stays progress. I have mentioned that the Albany Remand is under attack; that KAHN is doing his best to end the evidence repository at over 100 Docs, most of them Refusals for Cause.

    However there are some very convincing success stories that requesting a formal assessment or audit, with the participation of the subject "taxpayer" will induce an honest refund. This plays on the right to be heard. The response to the IRS Letter is to engage the agent to continue evaluation of the tax liability.

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by modnyc3 View Post
    How can that IRS agent just say that they don't process anything with the Demand for Lawful Money verbiage?
    That was a phone conversation. The Lesson Plan:

    • true identity
    • record forming - Refusal for Cause
    • redeeming lawful money


    This includes being on the brain trust. Here is some recent Crosstalk.

    Especially Step 2 - that is where I teach a suitor how to express redemption in terms the IRS attorney understands. Very effective.

    Quote Originally Posted by modnyc3 View Post
    Are they now sending FrivPen letters to anyone who files a Lawful Money return?
    Just about anybody who is redeeming lawful money is aware of me and how to get communications going. So I have to say that almost every FrivPen on this kind of income tax return comes to my attention. There have only been about ten FrivPens throughout my entire journey drafting remedy. There is always a problem with the return and I help spot it and we correct it. We invariably refuse the FrivPen presentment for cause.

    In the Albany Remand there was one suitor who was signing "Without Prejudice" - a patriot dreg. I kept missing it and it developed but since we corrected his R4C process he has received the forgiveness letter.

    Name:  Cleared IRS Account Letter 86C 60 Days_Page_1.jpg
Views: 790
Size:  252.8 KB

    Name:  Cleared IRS Account Letter 86C 60 Days_Page_2.jpg
Views: 820
Size:  102.6 KB

    Name:  Cleared IRS Account Letter 86C 60 Days_Page_3.jpg
Views: 814
Size:  294.2 KB
    Last edited by David Merrill; 03-27-20 at 09:10 AM.

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by modnyc3 View Post
    Yes! That's very good. But I was referring to the phone call clip you provided. How can that IRS agent just say that they don't process anything with the Demand for Lawful Money verbiage? Are they now sending FrivPen letters to anyone who files a Lawful Money return? I guess I am wondering if there is a solid way to fight against a FrivPen letter if one receives it after having filed a Lawful Money return. I'm still new to all this....
    DM offers some sage advice -- TAKE IT TO HEART -- requesting a formal assessment or audit, with the participation of the subject "taxpayer" will induce an honest refund. This plays on the right to be heard. The response to the IRS Letter is to engage the agent to continue evaluation of the tax liability.


    Used to have a suitor here "Martin earl"....give a read to his posts in the following link.....DON'T BE AFRAID....YOU'RE IN THE RIGHT !!

    http://savingtosuitorsclub.net/showt...ll=1#post24356

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •