Results 1 to 10 of 49

Thread: New Rendition of Libel of Review

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member Michael Joseph's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    peaceful inhabitant on the Earth
    Posts
    1,596
    you know a friend and I [he is 63] were just discussing feminism the other day. He and I came to the conclusion that it was a rouse by the managing class to get more labor at a cheaper rate. The market had overnight twice as much labor - therefore by supply and demand - the management could reduce the pay scale - therefore, it took two to work in order to maintain the same lifestyle that one [father] could provide before. And who suffers - EVERYONE - because little Johnny and little Susie are now shuffled off to the Public Fool System where they are taught to be good little Clerks - may I take your order please.

    This week boys and girls we will study X and at the end of the week we will test on X. I mean after 12 years of the PFS if you can't take an order then you truly are a numbskull.

    I know, I have just infuriated all the women - so be it.

    MJ
    Last edited by Michael Joseph; 10-08-12 at 09:57 PM.
    The blessing is in the hand of the doer. Faith absent deeds is dead.

    Lawful Money Trust Website

    Divine Mind Community Call - Sundays 8pm EST

    ONE man or woman can make a difference!

  2. #2
    Senior Member Treefarmer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    in the woods known to some as Tanasi
    Posts
    476
    Quote Originally Posted by Michael Joseph View Post
    you know a friend and I [he is 63] were just discussing feminism the other day. He and I came to the conclusion that it was a rouse by the managing class to get more labor at a cheaper rate. The market had overnight twice as much labor - therefore by supply and demand - the management could reduce the pay scale - therefore, it took two to work in order to maintain the same lifestyle that one [father] could provide before. And who suffers - EVERYONE - because little Johnny and little Susie are now shuffled off to the Public Fool System where they are taught to be good little Clerks - may I take your order please.

    This week boys and girls we will study X and at the end of the week we will test on X. I mean after 12 years of the PFS if you can't take an order then you truly are a numbskull.

    I know, I have just infuriated all the women - so be it.

    MJ
    I do not take offense at this, I think you are exactly right.
    You followed the money and deduced one of the true motives behind feminism.
    Another motive for feminism is the Satanic destruction of the God-ordained marriage of one man with one woman, which leads to the destruction of families, which results in the destruction of children, IMO.

    I think you are right on with your comment, except for your spelling of "rouse"; you were probably thinking of ruse?
    Treefarmer

    There is power in the blood of Jesus

  3. #3
    Anthony Joseph
    Guest
    This "idea" (feminism) was NO DOUBT created by men; men who would eventually profit (in many ways) from its indoctrination into modern culture and society.

    Think about it for a minute, in the 1950's the family unit was as strong as ever in the modern age for obvious reasons. People understood the Divine heirarchy and gender roles which made for strong family ties and no need for the STATE to play "nanny" or "parent". That success, if left alone, would only get stronger and stronger and something had to be done to break-up the traditional family unit if the STATE wanted to grow and expand its control.

    Enter feminism, socialism/communism, homosexuality, humanism, sexual revolution, etc.

    These ideas convinced women that possibly the most honorable and noble endeavor on earth (mothering/nurturing children and keeping a happy home) was somehow a waste of their life's potential. It also convinced them that sexual promiscuity is a woman's way to break free from the chains of "archaic" notions of virtue and being pure.

    How's that working out ladies? Ask the women of the sixties and seventies who "bought in" if they feel good about "breaking those chains" and if they at all benefited from that activity now. The beneficiaries of that doctrine are the men who suddenly became surrounded by an onslaught of "easy women" in the sixties, seventies and beyond. Does feminism still sound like a noble idea from the minds of women?

    Modern technology/computers, feminism and overseas job outsourcing combined for the destruction of the family unit since "Dad" no longer could support his family as he once could. Machines/computers, women and foreigners are doing the jobs he used to do and he no longer has the respect of being the provider for his family.

    Enter depression, alcoholism, abuse, mediocrity, laziness, drug addiction, etc.

    Modern society intentionally blurs the gender line so that women act like men and men act like women creating a non-gender distinguishing amalgam of humans; THE NEW NORMAL.

    How's that working out? The STATE is bigger than ever and has more control it has ever had. We have the most people ever relying on and trusting in the STATE, in one way or another, than ever before.

    But then again, this is all just common sense, isn't it?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •