Cracking the Code Failure - Doreen Indicted

[bobbinville]

I think that what the government is saying is that Doreen has no legal basis for believing that she is filing correct returns, and that while she may still truly believe that she is filing correct, CtC-educated returns, she is legally barred from doing so unless she can enunciate a legal basis for convincing the government otherwise. That's the way that the court system works, my friends; and unless you can set forth a compelling legal argument during your appeal, you are going to lose, no matter how fervently you may believe in CtC or anything else. You may believe that the courts have been consistently wrong on CtC; but unless you can convince them otherwise, you are going to pay the price. Pete did; and it looks like Doreen will do that as well.

[JohnnyCash]

Kudos to Mrs. Hendrickson for standing up for what she believes in!

I think that what the government is saying is that Doreen has no legal basis for believing that she is filing correct returns, and that while she may still truly believe that she is filing correct, CtC-educated returns, she is legally barred from doing so unless she can enunciate a legal basis for convincing the government otherwise. That's the way that the court system works, my friends; and unless you can set forth a compelling legal argument during your appeal, you are going to lose, no matter how fervently you may believe in CtC or anything else. You may believe that the courts have been consistently wrong on CtC; but unless you can convince them otherwise, you are going to pay the price. Pete did; and it looks like Doreen will do that as well.

Bobbinville, do you have some experience with how the court system works? The option to redeem lawful money is a compelling legal argument that worked for me (6 years running, thank you) and countless others here. I note your fearmongering but can tell you I did not lose & I have not paid the price for standing up to the banking cartel running this country. Your threats are empty.

[bobbinville]

I assure you that I am well familiar with how our court system works. As for the rest of your post -- I didn't come on here to stir up trouble or get into debates; so I'll just say that I disagree with you and leave it at that.

[JohnnyCash]

I assure you that I am well familiar with how our court system works.

Rather than your assurances, do you have experience with how the court system works in some capacity?

[bobbinville]

Yes -- but that's only my assurance. I doubt that you'd believe anything I offered you.

As for your opinion/facts dichotomy: when it comes to court cases, the law is what the court decisions say it is - unless and if there is a new decision overturning the first one. Doreen can say all she wants; but until she can elicit a new court decision which overturns the previous adverse decisions, she is doomed.

[David Lyn]

The courts don't care what the law says. Anyone who thinks they do is kidding themselves. I have seen a judge personally say the "16th amendment gave Congress the right to tax income" in spite of the fact that the Supreme Court says ".... the 16th Amendment conferred NO NEW POWER of taxation.