This filing seems to be the original that was then amended; http://img690.imageshack.us/img690/2...icaearlier.pdf
*Edit - I had attached the wrong file.
This filing seems to be the original that was then amended; http://img690.imageshack.us/img690/2...icaearlier.pdf
*Edit - I had attached the wrong file.
Last edited by EZrhythm; 09-19-11 at 11:23 AM.
Originally Posted by EZrhythm
Amazing post Allodial!
You mean a more recent amendment since August 12th? I don't find an attachment. I think that's it. I am not finding Carmen's name on the links so far.
All rights reserved. Without prejudice. No liability assumed. No value assured.
"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius"It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out a matter." Proverbs 25:2Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. Thess. 5:21.
the filing gets a mention by George Ure this week:
A Troubling - or Inspired - UCC Filing
How is it that a traffic case and some ones notice to run for congress apply to this thread?
Other then that, just like any other corporation they will change their images to entice you into buying their crap!
"" • If an agent signs on behalf of his or her principal without the authority to do so, the principal will not be liable on the instrument, whereas the agent will be. ""
- simple contract law, whomever reserves the right to revoke in a action obviously is the one with liability. BUT have we absconded that liability by our own actions thus become subject to liability?
First big clue here on that sigil on the wall: " The Inc. Village ".
Last edited by motla68; 09-25-11 at 12:48 AM.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote