endorsing and SS.......a big question!

[shikamaru]

I'm speaking of the gold confiscation act.............I beleive it was an act? If not, the president can only dictate to its subjects, not the People, unless it was a presidential executive order. Come to think of it I think it was an executive order.

Trading with the Enemies Act of 1917
Emergency Banking Relief Act of 1933
Gold Reserve Act of 1934

Executive Order 6102
Invalidation and reissue of aforementioned executive order
Campbell v. Chase National Bank of New York (1933)
Executive Order 6102
Executive Order 6111
Executive Order 6260
Executive Order 6261

Default of the Fourth Liberty Bond

Exchange Stabilization Fund

Its not their opinion or anybodies opinion you are listed as a US citizen and acting like subjected US citizen by asking them for permission to do something.....drivers license, marraige license!

This is true. Licenses are not contracts though. Licenses are servitudes.

After all it takes your signiture does it not?

Signature and name

[jesse james]

Trading with the Enemies Act of 1917
Emergency Banking Relief Act of 1933
Gold Reserve Act of 1934

Executive Order 6102
Invalidation and reissue of aforementioned executive order
Campbell v. Chase National Bank of New York (1933)
Executive Order 6102
Executive Order 6111
Executive Order 6260
Executive Order 6261

Default of the Fourth Liberty Bond

Exchange Stabilization Fund



This is true. Licenses are not contracts though. Licenses are servitudes.



Signature and name

Did you know that all Congressional Acts are territorial in nature?
This is why you see in the Social Security Act redefined "state" to include DC (which is not a state) Puerto Rico, Quam, Virgin island and such other treeitories and insulars included in the term "state".
So "the state of Iowa" is no different than Puerto Rico or Dc as far as the Act is concerned.
"Iowa" is one of the 50 states of the union belonging to (what I refer as the confederation of union states) "of America" while the "the state of Iowa" is the federal side belonging to the "United States" (notice the "of America" missing) that the District of Columbia and territories are equals. Research the Buck Act for more on this subject.

The Us Constitution restricts the federal government to go into union state territory except for dock yards, millitary fortifications, arsenals and such. Well since the 14th amendment now established a federal citizen they needed some how to control these new federal 2nd class citizens in the boundaries of the union states, so the Buck Act came about.
Yes an act was enacted called the Buck Act that used the exact boundries of Union States for federal states. The federal state for "Iowa" is called "the state of Iowa".
Look at your drivers license and tell me you dont see "the state of"!

[shikamaru]

Did you know that all Congressional Acts are territorial in nature?
This is why you see in the Social Security Act redefined "state" to include DC (which is not a state) Puerto Rico, Quam, Virgin island and such other treeitories and insulars included in the term "state".
So "the state of Iowa" is no different than Puerto Rico or Dc as far as the Act is concerned.
"Iowa" is one of the 50 states of the union belonging to (what I refer as the confederation of union states) "of America" while the "the state of Iowa" is the federal side belonging to the "United States" (notice the "of America" missing) that the District of Columbia and territories are equals. Research the Buck Act for more on this subject.

Well aware of all this.

The Us Constitution restricts the federal government to go into union state territory except for dock yards, millitary fortifications, arsenals and such. Well since the 14th amendment now established a federal citizen they needed some how to control these new federal 2nd class citizens in the boundaries of the union states, so the Buck Act came about.
Yes an act was enacted called the Buck Act that used the exact boundries of Union States for federal states. The federal state for "Iowa" is called "the state of Iowa".

Well aware of this as well.

Look at your drivers license and tell me you dont see "the state of"!

The State (belonging to) <such and such>.

[jesse james]

One of the hardest things for CtCer's to understand is the term "state"........still is for most of them!
I explained the Social Security Act to them a few times in the past and they said I didnt know what I was talking about when it came to the redefined term "state".
Kept saying "stand tall warriors" and "Pete is right and has them on the run".
Unbeleivable!
Yet it was right there in black and white english that a child of the third grade level can easily comprehend and still they refuse to beleive what the redefined term was telling them.
Pete is just an elegant writer, nothing more........................cracked nothing!
Caused a lot of people to get outlandish fines and imprisonment for his writing skills.

[stoneFree]

Scroll up jesse, you're not at a CtC forum. Check this, here's a scan of the MISS YOU letter the IRS sent Freeman after he walked off the federal tax plantation:

http://img706.imageshack.us/img706/4525/missyous.png
http://img190.imageshack.us/img190/7798/backside.png

Of course he didn't respond, and the IRS did nothing.

BTW, I see constitutional dollars are on sale today, thanks to the banking cartel (operating through JPMorganChase). Stock up!

[Treefarmer]

Did you know that all Congressional Acts are territorial in nature?
This is why you see in the Social Security Act redefined "state" to include DC (which is not a state) Puerto Rico, Quam, Virgin island and such other treeitories and insulars included in the term "state".
So "the state of Iowa" is no different than Puerto Rico or Dc as far as the Act is concerned.
"Iowa" is one of the 50 states of the union belonging to (what I refer as the confederation of union states) "of America" while the "the state of Iowa" is the federal side belonging to the "United States" (notice the "of America" missing) that the District of Columbia and territories are equals. Research the Buck Act for more on this subject.

The Us Constitution restricts the federal government to go into union state territory except for dock yards, millitary fortifications, arsenals and such. Well since the 14th amendment now established a federal citizen they needed some how to control these new federal 2nd class citizens in the boundaries of the union states, so the Buck Act came about.

Really? OMG, why didn't they teach us this in school?

Yes an act was enacted called the Buck Act that used the exact boundries of Union States for federal states. The federal state for "Iowa" is called "the state of Iowa".
Look at your drivers license and tell me you dont see "the state of"!

Thank you jesse james for pointing out the conspiracy for me, or I would have had to do it.
You are making this easy on me

[jesse james]

This is all public knowledge you know!
You are suppose to know and understand the law.
The only conspiracy I say there is is one that halted "civics class" from further being taught in public schools and replacing it with government class.

[Treefarmer]

Trading with the Enemies Act of 1917
Emergency Banking Relief Act of 1933
Gold Reserve Act of 1934

Executive Order 6102
Invalidation and reissue of aforementioned executive order
Campbell v. Chase National Bank of New York (1933)
Executive Order 6102
Executive Order 6111
Executive Order 6260
Executive Order 6261

Default of the Fourth Liberty Bond

Exchange Stabilization Fund



This is true. Licenses are not contracts though. Licenses are servitudes.



Signature and name

Thank you shikamaru; that's excellent info to have here in this thread.
You rock!