'smatter BY, cat got your tongue? Have you been instructed not to respond?
BTW, I read your latest and found no typographical errors this time - congrats on that. I see the court is quoting from Black's Law which is comforting since many of us here use it too. And I couldn't help but notice your displeasure at the court finding for the little guy, the debtor, and not the creditors (banking cabal).
Originally Posted by JohnnyCash
Looking over Jay's profile on Forbes I suspect that if he were actually registered and posting here, he would reveal his identity. I believe you perceive cyberspace as much smaller than it actually is in reality. There are so many people out there all under alias identities (except for a few of us) that it is futile to consider you have made a match just because somebody's opinions are in alignment with somebody else's.
However if you have matched up his IP and email address then I think you are onto something...
Apparently ..You, JohnnyCash..
have no cognitive thought Process, as to empirical evidence
Simply this ...
Before I personally commence an Action, or Process, I should have a good understanding of the Method, and the Rrebuttal
I have nothing to do with any Quatloosian Venue, and am moste certainly not a QuatLoser
My original supposition still begs a coherent Answer
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote