Quote Originally Posted by David Merrill View Post
Ms. PEET signing her oath of office makes her a party to the Constitution.

Her oath of office is a fungible fidelity bond assuring her performance will be as such - pursuant to the constitutions. Your misinterpretation of the Padelford opinion is common.
Alright now in that thought, where is our oath of office a fungible fidelity bond we signed off on assuring performance to be a part of the Constitution?

Please do explain your position on this case with inserted documentation to back up your position? thank you