endorsing and SS.......a big question!

[motla68]

I fail to see how this is germane to jesse james' post as a substantive rebuttal.



And that, my boy, is a pre-supposition i.e. presumption.
A faulty presumption at that of your own creation.
Do you understand what reporting is or must I forward the definition of the word "according" to you?

You probably can do nothing as well. Don't speculate. Go big or go home.

To show the cheese effect of case cites whether it has anything to do with me.

Am I your boy? talk about presumptions !

Well what is more so, getting your information from a third party(informer) or actually showing the statutes and acts referring to?

By what authority requires me to report?

Same to you , go big or go home. Why are you so hung up on the interpretations of the informer? Do you really think a judge
in court you are speaking to is going to care who the informer is?

[shikamaru]

To show the cheese effect of case cites whether it has anything to do with me.

Am I your boy? talk about presumptions !

Well what is more so, getting your information from a third party(informer) or actually showing the statutes and acts referring to?

He gives cites.
If you ask me nicely, I may give them to you.

By what authority requires me to report?

My awesomeness .

Same to you , go big or go home. Why are you so hung up on the interpretations of the informer? Do you really think a judge
in court you are speaking to is going to care who the informer is?

This is not a court, motla.
Courts have their customs and practices that are their norms.

I'll humor you. I'd use their resources. There is more than enough to successfully administrate one's claims IF one enters that forum.
The wise administrator is the one who avoids controversy and can end controversies before they rise to the level of a hearing.

[motla68]

He gives cites.
If you ask me nicely, I may give them to you.



My awesomeness .



This is not a court, motla.
Courts have their customs and practices that are their norms.

I'll humor you. I'd use their resources. There is more than enough to successfully administrate one's claims IF one enters that forum.
The wise administrator is the one who avoids controversy and can end controversies before they rise to the level of a hearing.

No thank you, got bigger fish to contend with.

yes, that profile was overdue being updated, guess we think alike in that respect.

Suppose we were able to make that claim without entering their forum?
Ditto in avoidance. This also applies to not using any case cites, man's statutes, regulations or policies. The simplification of it is just calling things for what they are.. i.e. not consenting to a offer to act as surety for an unvalidated claim. Fight and they got you in the cross hairs.
Affidavits are negative averments therefor affidavits are for subjects, Declarations and Petitions however is for those with incompetence to stand under their courts and that is not a bad thing to say.