Deconstruction of the 14th Amendment

[motla68]

This document was written up by one of the original Coresource Solution member when we started in Jan 2009.

See attachment

[David Merrill]

Great topic!


I picked this up somewhere.

[Michael Joseph]

motla68 this is an excellent post and I encourage all who see this reply to re-read the foregoing post. Thank you.

can be seized only by way of military necessity

I was reading a WARRANTY DEED TO TRUSTEE just this morning and look what I found:


Quoting Deed:

"TOGETHER with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining, to have and to hold in fee simple forever."


Notice that: fee simple is allodial title; allodial to the estate - as in Real Estate - and it is to be held within the estate "FOREVER". And the Register has logged the Event. Fee Simple is not in Real Property - as the Grantor/Grantee relationship is not of the Parent Trust.

Quoting Deed:

"The Grantor hereby covenants with said Grantee that the Grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; has good, right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land, hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever, and that said land is free of all encumbrances...."

[MKnDave]

Hey people

Hello everybody! Great forum!Does anyone know more good forums or other resources on this topic?

[Arik Alan]

My father acquired REAL ESTATE within CALIFORNIA(paid in full with non redeemed FRN's) with a "fee simple" title. I have not reviewed it however i believe he is still subjugated to taxes on said property. That to me me would signify the fee simple title is not unencumbered. I am not for sure on this. I can ask him when he returns if i may aquire a copy of the "Fee Simple" title for review if anyone is interested.

Excellent Post Motla68. I will refer back to this a few times.

David, i'll be printing your attachment as well to refer back to. Thanks for the post

[David Merrill]

My father acquired REAL ESTATE within CALIFORNIA(paid in full with non redeemed FRN's) with a "fee simple" title. I have not reviewed it however i believe he is still subjugated to taxes on said property. That to me me would signify the fee simple title is not unencumbered. I am not for sure on this. I can ask him when he returns if i may aquire a copy of the "Fee Simple" title for review if anyone is interested.

Excellent Post Motla68. I will refer back to this a few times.

David, i'll be printing your attachment as well to refer back to. Thanks for the post

I was about to say that Motla68 and I had definitely shared forums in the past. I still have not put it together entirely though - except that where there is truth, there is certainly going to be more than one truth-seeker dabbling in it. I am trying to digest "deconstruct" as "dissect" though. Maybe he means to dissolve these words and works of legal "art", to destroy the constructive trusts built around them?

I am enjoying too, the speed at which StSC has grown so fast that I already cannot keep up with all the reading, and I do not want to blurt off-topic or simply annoying facts. I do however have a lot of factual material, accurate history to add, supposing it is interesting enough that readers and members might be able to look into it for verification.

Fourtheenth Amendment a Sham.

I am starting to appreciate how much time it takes to learn things. Especially now that I am having the tables turned by some of the members here.



Regards,

David Merrill.


P.S.

lol, we must have some of the same connections. The author is the same for both documents. He was on our original group that we started back in January 2009.

If appropriate, can you tell me the author's name and the name of the Group?

[David Merrill]

Jesus, being a Jew was speaking of the Laws of Moses. The next passage is just as interesting.

Mat 5:33 Again, ye have heard that it hath been said by them of old time, Thou shalt not forswear thyself, but shalt perform unto the Lord thine oaths:
Mat 5:34 But I say unto you, Swear not at all; neither by heaven; for it is God's throne:
Mat 5:35 Nor by the earth; for it is his footstool: neither by Jerusalem; for it is the city of the great King.
Mat 5:36 Neither shalt thou swear by thy head, because thou canst not make one hair white or black.
Mat 5:37 But let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil.

Here we find that something has changed. With the advent of the Messiah, there shall be no more swearing. I have attached an anonymously written treatise that has always caught my attention.

[Anthony Joseph]

Jesus, being a Jew was speaking of the Laws of Moses. The next passage is just as interesting.




Here we find that something has changed. With the advent of the Messiah, there shall be no more swearing. I have attached an anonymously written treatise that has always caught my attention.

For clarity only; I assume you use the modern era term "jew" loosely as being defined as "judean" in describing Jesus' character, and not as the real and modern era "jew" which is distinct from and mostly unrelated to judeans, hebrews, isrealites or semites of any kind.

That distinction is obviously a lesson in and of itself.

[Anthony Joseph]

Some additional Maxims

2 of 2

It seems I recall seeing this image presented by someone in Canada as proof of a "treasury direct account" of some kind of which can be tapped into for funds. As I remember, the presenter offered ZERO proof and evidence of this assertion. This was related to Robert Arthur MENARD's version of "security of the person" and other of his flawed and failed teachings.

[David Merrill]

For clarity only; I assume you use the modern era term "jew" loosely as being defined as "judean" in describing Jesus' character, and not as the real and modern era "jew" which is distinct from and mostly unrelated to judeans, hebrews, isrealites or semites of any kind.

That distinction is obviously a lesson in and of itself.

That is a deserving Topic for its own Thread; but I am saying so only because I refuse to let the 14th Amendment get buried along with:

My father acquired REAL ESTATE within CALIFORNIA(paid in full with non redeemed FRN's) with a "fee simple" title. I have not reviewed it however i believe he is still subjugated to taxes on said property. That to me me would signify the fee simple title is not unencumbered. I am not for sure on this. I can ask him when he returns if i may aquire a copy of the "Fee Simple" title for review if anyone is interested.

Excellent Post Motla68. I will refer back to this a few times.

David, i'll be printing your attachment as well to refer back to. Thanks for the post

What I mean by that is that Jesus' ethnicity as a Babylonian Jew is a hot button and will carry this thread off its Topic without a doubt, so I have to describe the Law as Jesus would know it pragmatically. As any Jew of his time. That would be to say that the US citizen, is bound by a natural re-statement of the Ten Commands called the Seven Noachide Laws. Paul ran to Felix, the Roman marshal for his life - protective custody - a benefit of the same Roman Welfare State that Paul created in that action. Paul was not in trouble for teaching Grace to the pagans in Asia Minor; Paul admitted to the Sanhedrin trying him that he was teaching the Seven Noachide Laws there:

Act 15:20 But that we write unto them, that they abstain from pollutions of idols, and from fornication, and from things strangled, and from blood...

Act 15:29 That ye abstain from meats offered to idols, and from blood, and from things strangled, and from fornication: from which if ye keep yourselves, ye shall do well. Fare ye well.

Neusner 1; Neusner 2.

For now I want to leave it there because the real hot button is What Would Jesus Not Have Done. The truth being that because Jesus was a law-abiding Jew, he would not have entered your home, even to save your servant's life. If for some reason he physically touched a gentile, he was bound to perform a ritual bath (mikva) before he could go attend synagogue. He was such an elitist that he even considered a northern Jew a dog unfit to lick up crumbs from the King's table.

What we should stick to in my opinion is this fealty system created by Paul and expressed in Romans 13. - For the sake of keeping on Arik Alan's point about the 14th Amendment.



Regards,

David Merrill.

[Anthony Joseph]

I can tell you for sure right now Robert Menard is not the author of this document, again this one also from NightWing.
For your benefit you might want to go check out the Success Stories category for my other post as evidence/artifiact to success.

If you read my post again, it would reveal that I stated that the image (back of the BC Card - NOT your document) was presented by someone else in the past as proof of an accessable "treasury direct account" for those who "secure their person". These were Canadians who were involved in the World Freeman Society of which Robert Arthur MENARD was a prominent member and teacher. If you read further into my post, I then stated that when challenged to offer proof of the existence of this "treasury direct account" and evidence that it can be accessed by someone who "secures their person", that was met with nothing but anger, belligerence and accusations of trying to mislead others away from this teaching. Apparently, the "papering package" related to this teaching was offered at a substantial price and that potential revenue was at stake when someone challenged the validity of what was being asserted and sold to others as "remedy".

[Anthony Joseph]

ok I apologize for the mistake. The back of the BC card no not the back of a treasury direct card, I have seen the front of it from another video and it is definitely a canadian BC card.

If I find the original video again will pass it on, not sure where you are getting your information from, it does not sound correct.

It was David Merrill who went round and round with a presenter of this BC Card image at the old "Freemen Society" forum. He asked for anyone to prove, or provide material evidence, that they could "access their account" through the number on the back of the BC card. As I stated earlier, NO proof or evidence was ever given to support this claim. David was subsequently banned from the site for expecting that proof be provided for this claim and for obviously making it difficult to sell their "papering package" which included this theory within it.

I am just providing my recollection of that discourse as I remember it. I read every post and response. You may want to inquire of David to verify the truth of my "recap" of events surrounding the Canadian BC card discussion if you feel this information is incorrect.

My take: it is a pile of crap sold in a nice expensive package.

[David Merrill]

It seems I recall seeing this image presented by someone in Canada as proof of a "treasury direct account" of some kind of which can be tapped into for funds. As I remember, the presenter offered ZERO proof and evidence of this assertion. This was related to Robert Arthur MENARD's version of "security of the person" and other of his flawed and failed teachings.

That's right, I just mentioned that over on the other thread.

I can tell you for sure right now Robert Menard is not the author of this document, again this one also from NightWing.

For your benefit you might want to go check out the Success Stories category for my other post as evidence/artifiact to success.

If you read my post again, it would reveal that I stated that the image (back of the BC Card - NOT your document) was presented by someone else in the past as proof of an accessable "treasury direct account" for those who "secure their person". These were Canadians who were involved in the World Freeman Society of which Robert Arthur MENARD was a prominent member and teacher. If you read further into my post, I then stated that when challenged to offer proof of the existence of this "treasury direct account" and evidence that it can be accessed by someone who "secures their person", that was met with nothing but anger, belligerence and accusations of trying to mislead others away from this teaching. Apparently, the "papering package" related to this teaching was offered at a substantial price and that potential revenue was at stake when someone challenged the validity of what was being asserted and sold to others as "remedy".

[David Merrill]

It was David Merrill who went round and round with a presenter of this BC Card image at the old "Freemen Society" forum. He asked for anyone to prove, or provide material evidence, that they could "access their account" through the number on the back of the BC card. As I stated earlier, NO proof or evidence was ever given to support this claim. David was subsequently banned from the site for expecting that proof be provided for this claim and for obviously making it difficult to sell their "papering package" which included this theory within it.

I am just providing my recollection of that discourse as I remember it. I read every post and response. You may want to inquire of David to verify the truth of my "recap" of events surrounding the Canadian BC card discussion if you feel this information is incorrect.

My take: it is a pile of crap sold in a nice expensive package.

I agree but keep open to idea that a stance against the alleged account can estoppel collections. The more credible rumor behind this process is that the billing started up again, like reserved in the letter. However we replicated this scientifically and the US clerk of court fudged up our evidence repository (Record) so badly by the time the suitor began repaying the bills, we could not help but feel that there was something there motivating the clerk to screw up the record like that.

With Rob;

I hear that business of never having to prove or support any assertions has caught up with him. The Papering Package has not shown him anything by way of results. Just a lot of dissappointed, angry or forgiving people who paid a lot of money to annoy public officials. The Law Society (Canadian Bar Association) will catch up to him with a bill if he decides to get back into the fray.

Speaking for myself and Rob. He attacked me all over the Internet for requesting, rather pointedly I admit, that he put up or shut up. He accused me openly for months of being a Government Plant because my Reality Check for Rob was destroying his illusions of being a guru. You can tell how stoned he is in this video, if you compare it to the public appearances when straight. But you get a look at this fellow's upbringing too. He admits that all the slur campaign (including Vancouver and Toronto Craig's List posts) were false accusations, but since I was rude that is all okay. No apology - just a stoned psychological evaluation. In fact, a big part of the Freeman Movement according to the World Freeman Society is free to be all stoned; as we see from Freeman Pete, broadcasting from New Zealand where the Pot Laws are very lax compared to the poor Freeman thinking they can light up because of their Papering Package. (8:00 Minute Mark.)

Robert Arthur Menard of North Vancouver has been prohibited by the Supreme Court from appearing as counsel, preparing documents for use in proceedings, and identifying himself in any way that suggests he is a lawyer. He was also ordered to pay costs.

I suppose there is nothing I can really do about the integrity of StSC within the scope of rules of evidence except promote that people will require posters making assertions and presumptions to show us exactly why they believe what they do. I intend to start a thread about graphics - so that members here can start using their computers to record valid research and dispel patriot mythology. It is why I seem to come off being much more smart than I actually am - I can show why I believe certain things to be true.

So Motla68;

If you want me (and I presume us now) to believe there is a registry of S/Ns on FRNs as stock certificates or any other variations of the Treasury Direct STRAWMAN philosophies I am all ears. But I expect you to articulate it here. Don't tell me that I can learn all about it at the end of link to somewhere else; wherever you read about it and became convinced. We have a great forum here and I will soon be teaching you how I do it. It takes a little time to learn how to be graphic and slows down posting but if you look around here, there are people who believe me because I showed what I am saying is true, as I said it.

Here is what I mean:

[David Merrill]

When I first learned of what I know now, yes I came from the camp of learning through Menard's Videos and WFS, But I cannot prove what does not exist, I never paid one penny to WFS or Robert Menard, if people pay attention he gives you all the tools you need for your brain through his videos to go verify what he is saying and create your own letters " due diligence " , the guy from that video you have a pic on even says this. People who buy them packages are too freaken lazy and complacent to come up with their own, therefore they hang on every word spoken and every piece of paper handed to them on a platter like drones, they never really learn anything for them self.
Others who I listened to in obtaining what I know is:

- Mary Elizabeth Croft
- Canada Truthseekers
- Vic Beck
- private group called " the givers "

After that it was just a matter of taking all my notes of due diligence and putting together what I learned, then went and did it, was successful at it and showed others who also were successful. This is not commercial redemption, using bond numbers, doing UCC1 or any other of that patriotic BS that is being taught out there right now. If you truly believe all men are equal then the letter you have an image pic of here is no better then the video I posted of a man showing the back of his Birth Certificate where is says " Revenue Receipt " , any attachments you may have manifested in your mind to those words were your own and not spoken by me.

There is no step by step procedure to this, nobody has written a book on it because any of that would also be hearsay and for those too lazy and complacent to really learn what this is, it is not a class you take and then just go do it, you have to eat, drink, run, walk, breathe what this is about. People like names in which to identify things with so we called it Coresource Solution. The Coresource is you, the Solution is when you look in the mirror and first forgive yourself of all the mistakes you made of using someone else's creation for your own profit and gain.

I will be posting more about this as time goes on, but if anyone is interested they can start with this site: http://www.whybefudd.info/

There you did it. That's what I mean. Instead of showing us your paper package substitute or whatever you sent me off to another website to go study - if I am "interested".

You have not shown me anything that would make going there seem worthwhile. I am not going to badger after you like with Rob, who was making videos and had a following. Understand that I have already been through this with Rob. I showed you the letter from the Canadian finance minister. That is where the rubber hits the road. There is no hypothecation on the birth certificate.

I believe in SDR's though. Paper Gold = Special Drawing Rights. That is a fictional basket of averaging five currencies and the good faith and credit in the Fed is a good part of that. That good faith and credit is described by endorsement so non-endorsement has an effect on the value of money indeed. The confidence and security building measures becomes quite fleeting when you think about it actually.

I just want the readers, members and suitors here to know that I am not feeling the need to defend based on some implied accusation that I am choosing ignorance by not wandering off this website to examine new evidence about - well, whatever it is that Motla68 is talking about. His explanation is more about what he is not talking about rather than explaining what his success story consists of. Motla68 can make good on his promise and I will on mine - to start a lesson plan on graphics so there is no excuse to lead us around in a dim light.



Regards,

David Merrill.


P.S. Continuity may be a little off to this point because Motla68 deleted nearly all his posts.