Quashing the Russian Indictment

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • David Merrill
    replied
    Originally posted by Christopher Thomas View Post
    https://twitter.com/RepArmstrongND/s...75118932545536

    This is interesting.. Representative ARMSTRONG speaks of "Federal Recusal". I'm guessing within this tornado of confusion behind MUELLER and this collusion mumbo...
    I don't pay to much attention to all this "drama"
    but am I wrong about this...? if, presidential candidates try to influence American's to vote for them and "President's" deal with other foreign powers than why wouldn't other foreign powers want to or not do business with a certain presidential candidate? surely, business with other countries will have positive or negative effects on this nation so...What I am basically asking is.., What is the problem? I mean TRUMP was saying things about U.K. Prime minister before he was a prime minister so TRUMP tried to interfere? I don't see the issue.
    Does not the same go for the Puppeteer?

    [The geopolitical social engineer?]


    Originally posted by lorne View Post


    And did you see the indictment accuses Concord of paying a troll farm $1.2 million a month for fake personas, false Twitter accounts, Faceberg ads, etc.
    https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...-top-courtroo/

    Question is, how much are they spending on STSC ?

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]5290[/ATTACH]
    This is how I quashed it after a few years, anyway. I emailed the Amicus brief with Dabney's oath to several attorneys at Reed Smith.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Email to REEDSMITH Defense Attorneys What I Would Do on 3 2 20.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	229.2 KB
ID:	44997

    See how her oath changes "So help me God." to "SO HELP ME GOD"?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Oath Dabney (3).jpg
Views:	4
Size:	124.6 KB
ID:	44998
    Last edited by David Merrill; 01-01-21, 12:19 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • David Merrill
    replied
    Some comical moments in the thread at the beginning...

    I heard Dabney L. as Daniel and had her oath all along. So I showed the chief judge oath instead on the Amicus Curiae brief. Also I plugged a 13 instead of 18 into the search engine and found SEALED v SEALED to mean a conspiracy - as my Amicus brief was served on the clerk of court.

    No mistakes - no accidents. If I had ended the melodrama that fast, then the Hunter debacle would probably have missed my attention altogether.

    I might spend some time reading through this thread and so digest exactly what is happening with my real time geopolitical social engineering platform; and how this Saving to Suitors' consulate works in embassy. Clubs and Associations are high on the political home rule municipal jurisdiction court of record authority. We have known that for a long time. Real people in Russia register here all day long. I can see when they sleep and when they are up working. I see them using TOR browsers...

    What was GUILLIANI doing? Why make such a fuss over Hunter's promises to Russia? And his commitments to projects underway in the Ukraine?

    Combined with dropping off, and then leaving his disk for recovery until it was abandoned tells me we have two Russian puppets under one Russian puppeteer.

    Leave a comment:


  • walter
    replied
    Originally posted by David Merrill View Post
    It makes me think that his business dealings with Russia and accomplishments in the Ukraine were meant to become public as counterintelligence.
    Political theater at its finest.

    Leave a comment:


  • David Merrill
    replied
    It gets saucy though. Better stuff than the Internet Research Agency above, with GUILLIANI as TRUMP's personal attorney spiking the little computer shop for leaking all the abandoned gossip.

    Leave a comment:


  • David Merrill
    replied
    Some things are very revealing about Russia, TRUMP and Hunter BIDEN.

    I get it about diversity. Saving to suitors' is all about that. What mystifies me is how Hunter could just drop off a laptop at a computer store, to recover data from his drive - to begin with? Much less that he would refuse to pick it up when it was done?

    It makes me think that his business dealings with Russia and accomplishments in the Ukraine were meant to become public as counterintelligence.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • David Merrill
    replied
    Originally posted by marcel View Post
    I can't get into that.

    JORDAN: Did you interview Mifsud?



    JORDAN: Is Mifsud Western intelligence or Russian intelligence?



    What did you have for breakfast?

    That's covered in the report.

    It's now clear Mueller didn't write the Mueller Report.
    https://youtu.be/TTPPzCXGh6g
    This is delightful! Thank you for sharing or I might get into that. Once you buy into illusion you might spend a lifetime wandering through Fable, Myth, Legend, Parable and Hallucination. I might start calling these The Five Foibles.

    Leave a comment:


  • David Merrill
    replied
    It is complicated, yet so simple. Maybe we are conditioned to expect complicated? So we fail to see how simple it really is - Redemption.

    Leave a comment:


  • marcel
    replied
    I can't get into that.

    JORDAN: Did you interview Mifsud?



    JORDAN: Is Mifsud Western intelligence or Russian intelligence?



    What did you have for breakfast?

    That's covered in the report.

    It's now clear Mueller didn't write the Mueller Report.

    Leave a comment:


  • Christopher Thomas
    replied


    This is interesting.. Representative ARMSTRONG speaks of "Federal Recusal". I'm guessing within this tornado of confusion behind MUELLER and this collusion mumbo...
    I don't pay to much attention to all this "drama"
    but am I wrong about this...? if, presidential candidates try to influence American's to vote for them and "President's" deal with other foreign powers than why wouldn't other foreign powers want to or not do business with a certain presidential candidate? surely, business with other countries will have positive or negative effects on this nation so...What I am basically asking is.., What is the problem? I mean TRUMP was saying things about U.K. Prime minister before he was a prime minister so TRUMP tried to interfere? I don't see the issue.

    Leave a comment:


  • David Merrill
    replied
    Originally posted by marcel View Post
    obstruction of justice without a crime.

    Could be this case is now doing more harm than good to the agenda of whoever hired Mule-er to run this hit job.
    I enjoy the carnival parody:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Doc 151 and Minute Order for Ex Parte 7 23 19.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	270.3 KB
ID:	44462

    It looks like today's main show is behind the curtain only. Where is Toto when you need the little mutt? Somebody pull that curtain back a bit so we can see!

    Note how the secret meeting is calling for firewall counsel.
    Attached Files
    Last edited by David Merrill; 07-23-19, 05:27 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • marcel
    replied
    obstruction of justice without a crime.

    Could be this case is now doing more harm than good to the agenda of whoever hired Mule-er to run this hit job.
    Last edited by marcel; 07-23-19, 02:48 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • David Merrill
    replied
    Maybe a little more explanation will help.

    The 'saving to suitors' clause' of 1789 is intended for consulate and ambassadors foreign, where the law of the flag might come into question. What law, of what state should be applied during trial?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	savingtosuitorsclose.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	63.7 KB
ID:	44460

    Look at Footnote (d):

    Click image for larger version

Name:	saving-to-suitors footnote.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	506.4 KB
ID:	44461

    So can you for a moment comprehend why as it becomes time for a Businessman instead of a President, to execute the bankruptcy we appointed through this conduit the man who has been through five personal bankruptcies?

    Leave a comment:


  • David Merrill
    replied
    The Data Blossom

    Witnesseth:

    To global server farms and data silos.

    I was careful to be rotating the bot screening in the registration process regularly. So all these email addresses have been keyboarded into the StSC User database by human hands. I suggest you download the attachments and then Search for ".ru", for example. Compare to ".cn" for China. [I removed the email roster because of potential misuse, and for the privacy of Users not involved with Presidential Appointments.]

    Find more information about country codes, phone codes, and ISO country codes. We've got the phone codes you need for easy international calling!


    Communication is creation and vice versa. The Platform is the true church - outside the domain of 501(C)(3) and ministering redemption to the Pope, as the Bishop of Rome - CASTLE CHURCH - For the Redemption of the Office BISHOP.

    Doc 1 of the Olympus Ordeal. Remember that Paul was Roman.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • marcel
    replied
    Taxpayer called, said they want their $35 million back.

    Facebook VP of advertising, Rob Goldman, tossed a major hand grenade in the "pro-Trump" Russian meddling narrative in February when he fired off a series of tweets the day of the Russian indictments. Most notably, Goldman pointed out that the majority of advertising purchased by Russians on Facebook occurred after the election, were hardly pro-Trump, and they was designed to "sow discord and divide Americans", something which Americans have been quite adept at doing on their own ...
    ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

    Leave a comment:


  • David Merrill
    replied
    Thanks for bringing this up. Here we find the geopolitical social engineering tweaking the Rectification of Judiciary. The Opinion and Order were first SEALED. Like Dabney is reading about herself here.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Doc 148 Sealed Opinion and Order.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	365.2 KB
ID:	44448

    That quote in the article is from Doc 48 attached.

    Recall how I filed and published amicus curiae, enabling all the Defendants the Refusal for Cause they used on the Summonses.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Doc 126 R4C on Summons to Appear_Page_1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	468.0 KB
ID:	44451

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Doc 126 R4C on Summons to Appear_Page_2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	562.1 KB
ID:	44452


    To get it you have to pay attention to the Dates and look at the docket report too. The Return of the Summons was not filed for a year, then ten days later it comes out that the Defendant had Refused the Summons for Cause on the same day?

    This is really an exceptionally fine ride!
    Attached Files
    Last edited by David Merrill; 07-12-19, 08:04 AM.

    Leave a comment:

Working...