Chex, good morning..I wanted to go over this post again...regarding the first paragraph...the pledge was provided which I don't accept under Suo moto...that is the only way I can interpret your question...if it was meant as one...
Express trust
Collapse
X
-
-
I'm writing a trust declaration for business use. I will be cotrustee. As a suitor I generally use True Name, however trustees are often tasked with banking duties so I think in this instance the trustee might be better named as Legal Name. What do you think?
Comment
-
Sounds like you are concerned with the bank asking the Trustee to provide his/her SSN to establish the TRUST's bank account, and a suitor doesn't have one? Who is the creator? Writing/speaking is synonymous with creation. What can be conceived can be created. I wouldn't sweat it. Consider the shareholders or trustee(s) can always vote to appoint or remove a trustee, should the bylaws allow.
Last edited by lorne; 07-19-18, 12:18 PM.
Comment
-
Finished the trust document and got it notarized and recorded. Looking forward to doing business in trust. Or perhaps I should say "as a trust entity." Thanks to everyone including, but not limited to, Gavilan. Turns out I didn't use the loaned asterisk so, I'll be returning it. Did make use of a footnote. Next is to issue the shares and convey more property to the Trust.
Comment
-
Originally posted by marcel View PostFinished the trust document and got it notarized and recorded. Looking forward to doing business in trust. Or perhaps I should say "as a trust entity." Thanks to everyone including, but not limited to, Gavilan. Turns out I didn't use the loaned asterisk so, I'll be returning it. Did make use of a footnote. Next is to issue the shares and convey more property to the Trust.
Nice! I am glad you are doing the work. Walking the talk. Redemption is the remedy. Redeemed are a fast-growing class action.
Comment
-
David Merrill;
Has the implied True Name FAMILY trust that was put into an express form been updated in the last few years? I remember it was designed to stand corrected if anyone presented valid corrections to it.
Magnanimously,
Christopher Theodore
Comment
-
Originally posted by Christopher Theodore View PostDavid Merrill;
Has the implied True Name FAMILY trust that was put into an express form been updated in the last few years? I remember it was designed to stand corrected if anyone presented valid corrections to it.
Magnanimously,
Christopher Theodore
I recall noticing how the convention is used by the French, predominantly. That is interesting when relating to Merovingian bloodlines.
Comment
-
Originally posted by David Merrill View PostWe use the convention in the brain trust. First and Middle names become First and Last legal constructions easily with practice and usage, custom. But when it comes down to aligning with the birth certificate writing First Middle LAST conforms nicely albeit it is converted in constructive trust to FIRST MIDDLE LAST.
I recall noticing how the convention is used by the French, predominantly. That is interesting when relating to Merovingian bloodlines.
Then did the first and only Act, that delegates a small portion of inherent sovereign powers.
Then I used your old "service via county recorder" and used the State address to publish it all into the public record, bought a certified copy and feel confident that it impeaches all the strawman arguments (double entendre intended).
With that, the True Name FAMILY trust and the Office of Citizen Brief I did, I think that address the political subject matter.
RHODES is a private matter.
I love the French, and while not a member of that club, it is just a bit of agape for them.
Comment
-
Originally posted by marcel View Post
Comment
Comment