LAW states registration not required

[xparte]

Forming the court based on the fiction is evident to everyone.We all been jailed paperwork possession is my term however the paperwork reads is all the law or legal evidence requires .No one is above the law and all being legally formed paperwork . OUR paperwork behavior on being arrested (such as mailboxes, sailboats and cars) the commercial address we know how traffic and traveling are registered actions . You inform or notice the municipalities of your fiction as it is a registered event and registered property is subjective to arraignment .PRIVATE PERSON with legal standing venue or re venue .The vehicle is you

[David Merrill]

I wrote this paper... https://www.scribd.com/doc/271354344...Fiction-6-2015

Thank you for sharing your paper.

Speaking for myself, I feel that I have walked that path and many years ago. Michael Joseph has been showing me how to articulate usage of property and property rights so that the creator-ownership makes some better sense to me now. And the law boundary really seems to be about redemption. Citizenship may have its points and even findings of fact, but for the most part, it is a mental law boundary that is easily ignored by you being alive on a certain jurisdiction. When it is really a matter of understanding redemption.

Making your demand.

But welcome just the same. Enjoy learning here. If you are like me, you will need to do this. I did.

[Michael Joseph]

Thank you for sharing your paper.

Speaking for myself, I feel that I have walked that path and many years ago. Michael Joseph has been showing me how to articulate usage of property and property rights so that the creator-ownership makes some better sense to me now. And the law boundary really seems to be about redemption. Citizenship may have its points and even findings of fact, but for the most part, it is a mental law boundary that is easily ignored by you being alive on a certain jurisdiction. When it is really a matter of understanding redemption.

Making your demand.

But welcome just the same. Enjoy learning here. If you are like me, you will need to do this. I did.

We happy beings in the good. For Adam is Wisdom and Eve is Love. And love is able to die to self for the common good.

[BLBereans]

Upon first glance, I also recognized the "welcome to the PERSON" gist of the paper; sort of for 'beginners' if you will. However, I did notice a very interesting nugget and angle while scanning:

Because a sole proprietorship is not a separate legal entity, it is not itself a taxable entity.

I struggle to find the tax target for the 'IRS' in this scenario.

The premise, if you read the paper, is to acquire an Assumed Name Certificate from the S.o.S. (Minnesota ONLY is the recommendation), which is like a d.b.a., using the full LEGAL NAME as the business entity and associating the given S.S.N. with it as its T.I.N. From that point of registration/certification, the LEGAL NAME used is a business NAME which is the sole proprietor of the sole proprietorship it conducts. It is now also in "good standing" and able to legitimately conduct business and commerce with other 'United States' entities as the law requires.

This further clarifies that the NAME is NOT you - good.

This makes use of the S.S.N. as being a business entity T.I.N. ONLY - good.

Any claim against LEGAL NAME after completing this simple process must now contend with the Assumed Name Certificate from the S.o.S. providing evidence that LEGAL NAME is a separate business entity and CANNOT be used for identification purposes.

If the A.N.C. is presented, any attempt to identify a man as that entity is Identity Fraud.

Seems like a straightforward and simple process which fits right in to the separation of man and PERSON idea.

Of course, the "accountholder" can still choose to have the sole proprietorship make demand for lawful money in ALL transactions. However, this seems to further, and more clearly, negate the presumption of identity with the LEGAL NAME and make LEGAL NAME recognized as a registered business entity in "good standing" that may legitimately conduct business and is able to defend itself against, or bring forth itself, claims in court.

I'd like to hear any opposing viewpoints regarding this.

[Chex]

http://www.minnesotaassumedname.com/https://www.facebook.com/help/commun...53185294828775

Here is BismoBeer Belly https://www.facebook.com/bismo.beerbellyhttps://www.scribd.com/doc/271354344...ATED-5-11-2016

https://www.cscglobal.com/cscglobal/pdfs/Adjudicate_Debtor_Name_Dispute.pdf

https://www.legalzoom.com/articles/w...gistered-agent

It seems like a lot of red tape to go through anyone person, registered legal business entity Trustee or a person of integrity to claim lawful money on a tax return.

Other items of interest.

Apostille Authentication http://www.sos.state.mn.us/notary-apostille/

A notary public is a person of integrity appointed by the Governor to serve the public as an impartial and unbiased witness. http://www.sos.state.mn.us/notary-ap...come-a-notary/

[David Merrill]

DBA is One in the Same Person:




See how it fails to identify which one I do business as?

So by the posts above I feel that there is a much different take on identification. Start by considering I have exposed a criminal syndicalism of judiciary that evades bonding; therefore there is no authority other than by force for the Department of Revenue to prosecute me for perjury. In last week's Complaint to the chief justice at the Tenth Circuit Court of Original Jurisdiction (not Appeals) for example I wish I had snapped a photo of the full page Oath that I Refused for Cause. Until Tim signs a proper bond, with the Secretary of State for a witness the whole complaint goes nowhere, because he is part of the fraud.

It matters not how big a band you gang up with in crime, it still separates you from God, from the Law. This is the essence of the PERSON as an individual. When one has coherent heritage and destiny, now is the time for peace. In late 1995 I filed my Certificate of Baptism from a Foursquare pastor into the transactions in the USDC Denver. This offer pulled a brick with my name on it from the Zigurat on the back of the US dollar:

https://youtu.be/SA57ix4jimc

It was a supporting brick, and this failure in the highly compressed information infrastructure opened the way for Securitization by all its names along the way (the next day was the first 31-Day Government Shutdown). I understood about the brick, I just did not get the Bailouts, Quantitative Easing, Housing Bubble, Stolen Notes - asset-backed feed-through certificates (Footnotes 4&6), easy Debt Ceiling raising etc. in the original prophecy.

A big component was that two weeks prior I had filed it In Forma Pauperis - objecting to having to pay the filing fee in the currency issued by the IMFIRS. That was refused but on my way back from Denver I received a page from co-author of Are You Lost at C? offering to pay the filing fee! He would pay by credit card and the court would stay open late if I went back to sign approval...

??

I accepted but only if the In Forma Pauperis was refused. No go. I had to approve that day or pay myself. James Harlan was also a 32nd Degree Freemason. This takes some processing to get, how badly they needed that supporting brick with my name on it.

Compare the finding of facts; The IMF.


...and a MLM Gold Bug looking to cash in on the loss of others' investments:

A new kind of moneythis article about Jim too.

The next thing you read is...

Risk warning

It is amazing that nobody sees on any Federal Reserve asset report gold will revalue to $42.22/fine troy ounce when it goes back into the system.

The LORD giveth, and the LORD taketh away. You watch. The end of Securitization draws nigh.

[allodial]

DBA is One in the Same Person:

[ATTACH]4589[/ATTACH]

I could not help but be reminded by "Pastor" Tony King's encouragement to become "one with your strawman". The way branches are treated is that they are regarded to be separate persons. The one doing business as "X" is in fact seen as the owner or surety for X with X being a distinct and separate person. It is possible for X to transfer, sell, convey, bequeath their rights or interests in X to another meaning X is a separate person. However, if you are suggesting that David Merrill does business as DAVID MERRILL and also as DAVID MERRILL and intended to collapse them into the same person or suggest they were a singular entity that is what that form would suggest. It does not make David Merrill living sole one and the same as DAVID MERRILL, SOMEWHERE, CO. Unless of course you intended to bring arm's length down to culpability for and sameness with a legal entity.

It matters not how big a band you gang up with in crime, it still separates you from God, from the Law.

Well that is what some people think. I have seen a case wherein a suitor pointed that out. Something like this: "Defendants' actions and modus operandi betray an underlying belief that if they tell lies together and in concert somehow their felonies would convert into acts of good. However, no how much they tell lies or deceive the People or themselves or their victims, their crimes are in fact crimes and their offenses are in fact punishable under both the laws of this state and the laws of the United States." (its important to note that the case was against persons alleging to hold public office but not against any officers or public officials.)

This is the essence of the PERSON as an individual.

Individual and trust can at times be synonymous. Individual can refer to a component or member of something.

When one has coherent heritage and destiny, now is the time for peace. In late 1995 I filed my Certificate of Baptism from a Foursquare pastor into the transactions in the USDC Denver. This offer pulled a brick with my name on it from the Zigurat on the back of the US dollar:

It tells you that they know what sin is or is not. Its that they wish to remain in sin without acknowledging the salvation or Karma Management methods of the one named a Exodus 3:14-15. Playing possum works how? Instead, they require victims. Statutes of frauds requires certain things to be in writing and willing. Being surety for a stranger is to be surety for them as they have estranged themselves from the Most High. However, a writing produced through fraud is voidable and unenforceable. They know what they are doing. I have seen someone decline U.S. citizenship only to have his relatives (secretly Marxist and secretly involved in secret societies) freak out. They did what they could to make them impersonate the fiction. The dead are without jurisdiction over the living and they know it. He recognizes that they willingly estranged themselves and had attempted to force them to estrange himself. He declined the offer for cause.

A big component was that two weeks prior I had filed it In Forma Pauperis - objecting to having to pay the filing fee in the currency issued by the IMFIRS. That was refused but on my way back from Denver I received a page from co-author of Are You Lost at C? offering to pay the filing fee! He would pay by credit card and the court would stay open late if I went back to sign approval...

It would follow that everything in ACH/Credit Card land is clearinghouse credit (Automated Clearing House).

The LORD giveth, and the LORD taketh away. You watch. The end of Securitization draws nigh.

The end of false/forged/forced/coerced securitization and false-gospel Arbeit Macht Frei "salvation" through sweat and labor?

...


Didn't we say that salvation is by works alone dammit!?!? Whose laughing now!

Anyone half awake should have been easily able to see the Nazis were snidely making the argument for salvation through works by hanging a sign "Arbeit Macht Frei" a snub in the face of both orthodox Christianity/Hebraism and Protestantism holding the view that salvation is through faith (even in the OT faith was key). You see the religious nature of World War I and World War II is right in your face.

For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast. Ephesians 2:8-9 (KJV)

For by grace you are saved through faith, and that not of yourselves, for it is the gift of God; Not of works, that no man may glory. Ephesians 2:8-9 Douay-Rheims

"...Abraham believed God, and it was imputed unto him for righteousness..." James 2:23

Faith is *the* substance.

Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen. For by it the elders obtained a good report. Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear. By faith Abel offered unto God a more excellent sacrifice than Cain, by which he obtained witness that he was righteous, God testifying of his gifts: and by it he being dead yet speaketh. Hebrews 11:1-4

[David Merrill]

It might have been in the form of a bot, but Beijing hovers at www.bishopcastle.us and this might be related to Doc 6 service plus Doc 12 too. I suspect that there are servers inside that big palace.

There is a mirror complex across the road too.

Individual and trust can at times be synonymous. Individual can refer to a component or member of something.

Thank you for developing that. I am pondering that now, as you seem to see. This seems to come back to the law boundary - redeemed or deluded. One cannot fight their way off the battlefield. Whatever church you go to, follow the rules and you get peace. The individual is out of trust; breaking the law (bylaws).

Here is what I mean by 501(c)(3) bylaws - the Capture by Bill of Lading:



All I have to do according to the "law" is enjoy some of that birthday cake the first Sunday of the month.

Being surety for a stranger is to be surety for them as they have estranged themselves from the Most High. However, a writing produced through fraud is voidable and unenforceable.

You touch upon a misunderstanding about Paul. Using the word "strangled" is the key to see that what Paul was teaching in Asia Minor (Turkey) was the Noachide Law. That is the "stranger" - NAKAR from NOKRIY as in Noahide Laws. This really busts through a lot of veils in Messianic Jew Torah study! - Or draws blank looks... Paul was not convicted for his teachings in Asia Minor because he taught exactly the law boundaries he was supposed to. He was back in Jerusalem with Roman citizenship papers hoping for acceptance with the Babylonian occupation on the Temple Mount, as a liaison officer from Rome - as a Benjamite Jew. When he saw it was not going to go over well he aborted and lied about the ship docking in Cyprus.


He became an individual from all three law boundaries (citizenship).

1) Roman citizen
2) Jewish (Babylon) citizen
3) citizen in heaven (on earth)

I am saying this because I hear that over 50% of Americans are on the government dole. This model is of Paul's making as he ran to Felix in Tyre for protective custody.


1928 take on War by Propaganda.

[allodial]

It might have been in the form of a bot, but Beijing hovers at www.bishopcastle.us

Its well known in certain circles that China pays attention to certain sites. If I recall correctly, the original purveyor of Australia the Concealed Colony website (http://www.basicfraud.com) said that the Chinese government took care to crawl and download his site contents at least twice. But now even archive.org omits some of the contents (the PDF documents). I noticed that only after a certain document was posted on this site did FRB St. Louis uploaded it to its own archives. Go figure. Those who believe all attorneys to be "in the know" are mistaken.

Re: Australia, IMHO what happened is that they established a territorial government (ala "the Australian Government" and the "Australian Parliament"--Canberra/ACT) and chose not to tell the Australians about the laws of succession with respect to the de jure Commonwealth of Australia.

...Here is what I mean by 501(c)(3) bylaws - the Capture by Bill of Lading:...

[ATTACH]4593[/ATTACH]

Perhaps the tax exemption is pottage? If one reads the bible its clear that "the children are free". What if, with some stretch, the IRS rules were a way of preventing spread of a counterfeit gospel? As in those that actually knew the truth wouldn't be asking for an exemption but instead would be asserting it.



Paul likely knew that the lesser lights ruled the night (i.e. those in darkness), that the greater lights ruled the day (i.e. those in the light) and that in any case the Creator...



...trumps.

[David Merrill]

Hmmm... pottage? As in vessels...

Nice food for thought. Thank you.


Potter's field. Where Judas went to mourn his failure to fulfill The Worthless Shepherd prophecy.

[allodial]

Potter's field. Where Judas went to mourn his failure to fulfill The Worthless Shepherd prophecy.

Re: Judas, Potter's Field
Ptah's field? Judas having fallen on his own sword seems to speak of a broken vessel. The redemptive power of blood vs silver vs blood money...hmm....

re: 501(c)(3)
No doubt, with that case out in Oregon when the IRS and bank returned those funds, they knew exactly why they returned them. So imagine 501(c)(3) having been written with the line of thought that "If you (alleged pastor-preacher) don't know the truth, you are counterfeit and you will be restricted (limited license) in your teaching." (Preaching pseudo-gospel like issuing currency based false weights and measures requires a special license!)

He is not the God of the dead, but the God of the living: ye therefore do greatly err. Mark 12:27

Re: Worthless/Foolish Shepherd
Zechariah 11 Fulfilled!

[David Merrill]

I almost used "licensure" in my post!

[Chex]

Because United States Notes serve no function that is not already adequately served by Federal Reserve Notes, their issuance was discontinued, and none have been placed in to circulation since January 21, 1971. United States notes serve no function that is not already adequately served by Federal Reserve notes. As a result, the Treasury Department stopped issuing United States notes, and none have been placed into circulation since January 21, 1971.

Does Russia use federal reserve notes?

"A new kind of moneyThe 1896-1901 Silver Certificate

[allodial]

FRNs pre-redemption fail to serve the function of affording the purchaser <direct> access to allodial title or probably even to decent fee simple title. FRNs are clearinghouse certificates of a private, federal clearinghouse. In the context of the Federal Farm among corporations and franchises, they serve little other purpose than FRNs because if the persons cannot attain to allodial title, they don't need US Notes or true sovereignty-backed money.

The Federal Reserve Act comes right into the context of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the like because all of the Wall Street players are actually profiting off of what belong to the peoples' of the several states. I see the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940 as rules for the Grand Exchange as to the limitations on what can or cannot be done with the People's Stuff. So maybe the Players are hoping to mass murder the true creditors in the name of Humanitarian Globalism before the creditors get too much wiser?

The public debt being how much the territories owe the Crown/People.