Notice in the last paragraph that the Arizona Attorney General, Bob Corbin, cleverly only addresses "that no individual citizen is a 'sovereign'; all citizens are subject to lawfully enacted state and federal laws."

He did not address the substantive question that Hon. Wayne Stump originally asked: "Can unenfranchised individuals who constitute the sovereignty of the State, with unalienable rights, be compelled into a diminution or forfeiture of those rights by administrative regulation or legislative enactments."

One can only assume that had Mr. Corbin addressed the substantive issue, that it may have been a politically unwise act to do, given his position of power in the fictional entity from which he was claiming authority.