DL was NOT provided or used as ID

[Michael Joseph]

this is exactly my point found HERE.

The officer is attempting to Construct a Trust. The NAME does not matter at Contract Law it can easily be overcome. DA to Officer - "is that him?" Officer: "Yes sir."

The name game at commercial law is not grounds for abatement. See the following Sanitized Report:

-----

17 MR. DA: --- Who -- whoever he
18 is, he's the person we're seeking to put on trial
19 today.
20 True Name: Does -- does the one
21 being put on trial not have to be named?
22 THE COURT: No.
23 True Name: Oh, so they don't have
24 to be named?
25 THE COURT: No. We -- we've tried

00047

1 John Doe's/

-----

4 MR. DA: Judge, the state is
5 contending, no matter what he may call himself today
6 -- he can call himself Mickey Mouse if that's what he
7 wants to call himself, but his body, that person, is
8 the one that this officer says was on that occasion
9 driving that motor vehicle.
10 What he wants to call himself, I really
11 don't care. We're here to try this person for the
12 charges issued by this officer. And we're ---
13 THE COURT: --- That's what the
14 trial will determine.
15 MR. DA: Right. .........

blah, blah, blah....


25 THE COURT: Well, we understand --

00015

1 and I'll be happy to refer to you as True Name --
2 that True Name is here for the trial of driving
3 with an expired registration plate and driving a
4 vehicle -- operating a vehicle without any license.
5 That's what we're here for trial.
6 The state will present any evidence that
7 you were the person that was present on......

-----

Your actions imply your trust! What you call yourself at commercial law really does not matter.

If he found TRUE NAME in the Federal Reserve Districts - moving on STREET/ROAD/HIGHWAY and TRUE NAME is with a Residential Address - well he has then conducted his Survey and found TRUE NAME within the STATE.

Was his survey correct? Only you know! A choice, yes?