Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 22

Thread: David, could you satiate my curiosity what happened to the bond company in your case?

  1. #11

    attuning the morphogenetic field

    I have been enjoying Star Trek - Discovery, a new serial. There is the myocelium a myocelial field much like I have imagined. Especially when I have said the pyramidal neuron architecture in our brain(s) (including the abdominal brain) maps exactly the stars in the nighttime sky. So grab an episode toward the end of Season 1 to get a feel for what I am talking about.

    Now get a glimpse of how I utilize the myeloconia in the pineal gland.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  2. #12
    Yeah, thinking about installing a spore hub drive in my car. Just beware of alternate universes when doing jumps.

  3. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by Cheryl Marie View Post
    I’ve read through your Doc 15. I get your invention. Awesome!


    Pertaining to the patent office’s communication back to you, that you R4Cd, I think you may have confused its personnel about your societal capacity; their communication seeks your commerce-based id (legal name linking to the residence / mailing address of the cestu que vie trust NAME) plus your compliance with other regulations pertaining to public-estate obligations as to the “commercialization of new technologies via the United States” from which they think you desire to benefit (from your Doc 15 page 48).


    I offer this because of the content of your Notice’s caption, Doc 15. I’m using the history synopsis document I’ve complied (along with other people) that I recently linked on the thread about how to purchase a home. Here’s that link again.


    Specifically, regarding your Doc 15, I suggest that you file a corrected caption and opening paragraphs to reflect the following:


    (1) The court’s name should be shown in all upper-case letters, since you (rightly) identify the Defendant as a corporate entity, not the actual government. I think that’s what you mean. The courts, since the Civil War, are functioning in breach of the organic trust structure of our government. That’s what’s so. But you are actually providing notice of your invention to the ‘awake’ officers at the federal level who are ending that breach, President Trump being chief amongst them who also wants the cure for the COVID-19 virus.


    (2) You, as a redeemed man, act “on and for the behalf of The United States” (the Union of States), not the United States. The latter is the designation of the municipal government that was later usurped by central bankers’ establishment of the municipal corporation. To act therein would be as a member of the Congress anyway. “The Constitution of the United States” (dating from March 4, 1789, fully ratified in 1791) enumerates what services the Congress is to provide to the people of the Union. The reference in its preamble: “for the United States of America” pertains to the British Territorial Government that was to provide services, via the District of Columbia, to British subjects inhabiting land here, and also to provide the American people peaceful relations on the High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways here (as the outcome of the 1783 Paris Peace Treaty ending our Rev War). See my history link, pages 1-3.


    (3) You should place “c/o” in front of the municipality-designated street address, and you could even indicate “Mailing location:” in front of that. You occupy the physical land of “Washington” by right in dominion-of-soil, not as a resident of the STATE OF WASHINGTON or the State of Washington.


    The Union controls the mutual soil jurisdiction of the people who form the States. The 1787 Constitution for the united States of America (dated May 25, 1787) is the original equity contract and federal constitution, the National Government for delegated purposes. The Decl of Independence pertained to the united [lower-case “u”] States of America. Unredeemed people have abandoned their God-created living-estate rights and constitutionally-protected societal Trust capacity to benefit from our shared sovereignty. And to benefit from our shared insights, and inventions.
    Like in 2003 when China reacted to my Eradication of SARS invention by announcing (threatening) to patent the genome, this invention announcement is to prevent somebody from capitalizing on my "awesome" invention. Nothing more.

    One might look at misguided David HUDSON. He kept thinking he should capture manna, or what he called ORMES, the white powder extracted from the meteorite impacted Arizona soil. The invention involved superconductivity and so the DoD became involved. It became more and more involved for David to get his patent, and finally the DoD was insisting he be able to convert the ORMES back to gold metal. That is when he realized that nobody could patent his invention, because he was already the inventor.

    That was all he wanted all along. He did not want some big corporation company to grab the invention and hide it. So he quit throwing money into the ill-begotten notion that he was trying to get his name on ORMES.

    Monatomic gold and such, especially healthy is Dr. DEAN with her Magnesium Miracle, is in the open domain. Anybody can put two electrodes in water with a DC voltage and benefit.

    I enjoy your faith in the CQV. There was also the Treaty of 1213 where the Pope allegedly overturned the Magna Charta two years before its signing in 1215. Both were in the Lodge. So by 1666 there was allegedly the governing of the Venetians through Rome. Ergo, the Olympus Ordeal deals with Paul and his remand to Rome. I had a pass to the Passages museum display while the Green Initiative put together the Bible Museum in DC. Amazing stuff.

    You can look for methods to regulate energy through machinations of law, using unbound administrative officials behaving as though they are judicial officers. Or you can manage energy. You probably saw the envelopes where I sent my patented invention to China. And I have other venues, including the brain trust too.

    Thank you for assuming this is a problem. I have US Patent #10,999,999 and even the typo in the header - #11,999,999 on the same invention.

    You have explained the intentions in the Letter well. I recall the specific instructions on the inventor name were exactly in alignment with Black's Law Dictionary 5th. And the diversions of energy also align with your suggestions about ALL UPPER CASE.

    If that is the reasoning behind the rejection, then it was incumbent upon the USPTO to explain it that way. Instead they lied about three points that are simply proven out in the receipt. I am managing the energy, just like I did in 2003 and I explain that clearly. I am not applying for a patent. I have applied the patent for healing purposes.
    Last edited by David Merrill; 10-29-20 at 07:30 AM.

  4. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by Cheryl Marie View Post
    Did you yourself assign that specific number, which you term a “US Patent number” to your invention? In choosing that number, did you not use the USPTO’s numbering system, meaning, did you not enter their commerce domain to obtain it? If so, they had the right to assume that you chose to apply for a patent and to thus require that you conform to their rules.


    Was it incumbent upon the officer who sent you the rejection letter, or the USPTO as a commerce-based organization (which is disclosed), to explain that, in commerce, one is an individual who is expected to know what he/she is doing? Commerce -- an international jurisdiction with rules of engagement -- is not trade, which occurs as a conscious energy exchange between two or more sovereign people.


    I get a similar response – i.e. ‘I was owed full disclosure and therefore I’m not responsible for’ – when I suggest to people that, if they proclaim they are of the sovereign people operating the States in the Union, but bond their energy with global currency controlled by a foreign entity, they have nullified their qualification to operate the sovereignty.


    When you, DM, say “three points that are simply proven out in the receipt”, do you mean their receipt of your physical document (how it was addressed by you), or their receipt of the points made within the content? If the latter, do you claim that the recipient – who likely acts as the initial screener of incoming mail – had the duty to read the content and discover and understand your capacity in relation to your invention (i.e that you are not applying for a patent but are applying the patent for healing purposes) before issuing the rejection letter?


    My point being, wherein which jurisdiction of law one stands and makes offers is so critical to communicate that one’s very first presentation must clearly indicate that. Ergo, my suggestions about how you’ve identified you as the inventor of your invention belies (or leaves questionable) that you are the one offering it to all people from the cosmic jurisdiction of law that is so aptly and intentionally phrased by the framers of our government as “the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God”. If that jurisdiction were to be clearly identified upfront in your Doc 15 caption and your patent doc's opening presentation, as I've suggested, then it seems to me that you can claim the right to utilize the USPTO's number. Its clients and/or customers are offered the same benefit from your invention as are all other people.
    What I keep hearing is that, "If you want to be understood in commerce, then act the role."

    Or maybe rephrasing, "If you speak to the unredeemed, behave as though you are not redeemed yourself."

    I say, Let the dead bury the dead.

    Therefore the Notice stands sound in commerce. I signed it "Trustee of the Resulting Trust." I saw the instructions and understood how they wanted to divert the energy through the CQV Trust, as you describe it. This invention is much more effective the way I am executing application of my patent. The USPTO is mine now.

  5. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by Cheryl Marie View Post
    My point being, wherein which jurisdiction of law one stands and makes offers is so critical to communicate that one’s very first presentation must clearly indicate that. Ergo, my suggestions about how you’ve identified you as the inventor of your invention belies (or leaves questionable) that you are the one offering it to all people from the cosmic jurisdiction of law that is so aptly and intentionally phrased by the framers of our government as “the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God”. If that jurisdiction were to be clearly identified upfront in your Doc 15 caption and your patent doc's opening presentation, as I've suggested, then it seems to me that you can claim the right to utilize the USPTO's number. Its clients and/or customers are offered the same benefit from your invention as are all other people.
    What I don't understand is my interest in explaining.

    Maybe I should point out where, in the patented invention I say clearly that my invention replaces that loss.

    A wacky looking Iranian strips some copper wire, burns it with a torch and advises people to use a dead AA battery to dissolve the copper with zinc into water. Then carefully drink the water with the pico - monatomic copper. This will cure and prevent COVID-19. Manna is manna. Once the metal loses its gluons it behaves all the same. The only way to distinguish what is in it is by arcing for minutes, reaching the boiling point of the metal(s) and the will be a flash while that particular manna compresses charge and disappears. But gold corresponds to the pineal gland and a fairly low boiling point among the transition (Noble) metals. So we find that composed the burning bush and sure enough Moses returned from the mountain enlightened.

    P.S. I am adding some items from my desk. What you are looking at is magnesium manna fabrication. Yesterday the current was 1.1 uA (micro ampere) and today it is .88 uA. I carefully draw from the clear center of the glass with a straw then replenish the glass with Berkey Blue filtered water. Just the same, after a while without drinking the current went down, not up. So by keeping the voltage low I pump monatomic atoms of pure magnesium into the water from the negative (black) electrode (cathode). Rust, or magnesium oxide builds up and precipitates off the positive (anode) electrode. So the ionic content would rise if I were pumping metal clusters into the water, which would happen if I passed a certain voltage - maybe 2.5V instead of the 1V.

    Human magnesome. I mention this as informative reading in US Patent #10,999,999.

    Name:  mag manna 11.jpg
Views: 70
Size:  317.8 KB

    Name:  mag manna 12.JPG
Views: 69
Size:  486.5 KB

    Name:  mag manna 13.JPG
Views: 71
Size:  569.4 KB
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Last edited by David Merrill; 10-29-20 at 10:36 PM.

  6. #16

    David, could you satiate my curiosity what happened to the bond company in your case?

    Quote Originally Posted by Cheryl Marie View Post
    Regarding also Gavilan's post about bringing to light their corruption, I offer this interjection about the Endgame --

    I know you, DM, place great reliance on the form of oath that judges take. While the oath bonds their operation of the office and their immunity, I find that it’s irrelevant to our (redeemed people) access to justice whether their published oath shows SO HELP ME GOD or "So help me God" or that a proper witness validated it, in relation to the judge’s function with respect to the individual municipal cestui que vie trusts (designated FIRST MIDDLE LAST). We have relief. All actions are begun in commerce, on the presumption that all parties to it transact their energy in commerce. The individual CQV trusts were established by central bankers as the vessel / account for the American people to move their energy in global commerce...
    The bond company went bankrupt. This is the nature of sustainable debt. Maybe better, "The New Common Law."

    David, could you satiate my curiosity what happened to the bond company in your case?
    Name:  bankruptcy - Bouvier Law Dictionary.jpg
Views: 73
Size:  457.3 KB

    Think "case law" and you might get it. Precedent; or stare decisis. So with BERNARD, like found earlier in this thread, Steven Leon is tasked with preservation of a term, Judiciary. But he cannot allow this to become precedent, that any entire "judge" career be termed vacant and completely reversible. So what he did was to assemble a completely new tribunal of unknown "judges" to rule there was no precedent given. No authority.

    This is juxtaposition from the common law of England still founding Colorado territory:

    Name:  6744-974.jpg
Views: 66
Size:  110.7 KB

    But the Territory never properly formed. It required 30 days for the restructure to take hold just like all the Government Shutdowns. These days the territory is virtual.

    Name:  Government Shutdown history.jpg
Views: 69
Size:  115.0 KB

    The only real shutdown was from businessman CEO (not President) Donald John. It is the only one that lasted more than 30 days. Search by words yourself, the attachment.

    These days think - Bretton Woods - when you think international bankruptcy in constellation, in admiralty. But you also have it right there in this thread that BERNARD pretends to be judicial. You cannot change your oath of office and still be bound. BERNARD has not changed his oath, but what he did was pull a fast one. Upon being ordered, he produced the oaths of the tribunal by prompting the reluctant Secretary of State - then he swapped out the tribunal without notice. And even held up the mail using COVID-19 in the prison system.

    Ergo we find that the Patent #10,999,999 hits the nail on the head. We all fearfully vilify a particularly clever and contagious virus for suddenly killing the infant and elderly. We fear monger, as I have put it as The Inventor. Except of course MJ - chuckling at the masked masses. But the objective is to cause everybody to tremble and accuse those who do not become vaccinated with my competitor intrusive injections to be criminal. I have disassembled a multi-billion dollar industry by reviving ancient modalities of healing and preventing disease.

    Now the rubber meets the road with managing energy flow, capital flow. Or as I put it back in 2003, capital integration.

    How did the meeting go?

    Ambrogio.Cesa-Bianchi@bankofengland.co.uk
    Annamaria.deCrescenzio@oecd.org
    Mark.Joy@bankofengland.co.uk
    AKokeny@imf.org
    Etienne.LEPERS@oecd.org
    Dennis.Reinhardt@bankofengland.co.uk
    Julia.SCHMIDT@banque-france.fr

    Which is the better-described breach of trust. Not healing the world, when the cure is properly presented. So now Cheryl Marie might better see why the USPTO is mine. I am the Trustee. And as found in Doc 12, the lienholder.

    Name:  Strategic Intelligence Membership guidance.jpg
Views: 71
Size:  231.5 KB
    Attached Files Attached Files
    Last edited by David Merrill; 10-30-20 at 08:13 AM.

  7. #17
    Senior Member Michael Joseph's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    peaceful inhabitant on the Earth
    Posts
    1,581
    A couple of days back the governor for the State of North Carolina issued an executive order basically stating that it is a landlords duty to notice a tenant of this new EO 171 which relates that if the tenant cannot pay the rent due to effects caused by Covid-19, then the landlord cannot evict said tenant for lack of performance on the rent.

    You can read said EO here - CLICK HERE

    Now consider the ramifications of such an EO and the constitution. Remember that the State cannot pass a law which interferes with the obligations of an existing contract. So what of the contract between the landlord and the bank? Will or can the bank foreclose if the landlord can't perform on the mortgage? Begging the question "Has the constitution been suspended due to emergency circumstances?"

    If the answer is no to the foregoing question, then does the bank become the new landlord upon foreclosure? And will the current lease overreach a foreclosing of all the equities in the property? The governor who of course has politicized this Covid-19 foisted as much fear as politically possible stating that the "rural" people who are "generally white" should not assemble in groups such as "church, etc." Anybody with even half a brain can see thru this mask-erade as it is clearly an attempt to persuade those who would vote for Trump to not vote at all due to the possibility that they "might" get sick. In the name of "goodwill", it appears said governor is buying voters with taxpayer dollars. How much chaos is needed to usher in their beloved Socialistic State under one religion?

    Honestly, I can't even believe how ridiculous this Covid business has gotten. Said governor even went so far as to say not wearing a mask is unpatriotic. Groaning inside. So stupidity has taken over. Because clearly common sense has been thrown in the street and is being trampled by those who would manipulate a people who refuse to use their own minds. But what is new under the sun?

    I'm reminded of Jim Morrison (Lyrics to THE END) - The Doors

    "Can you picture what will be
    So limitless and free
    Desperately in need of
    some strangers hand
    In a desperate land....

    Lost in a Roman wilderness of pain
    And all the children are insane
    All the children are insane
    Waiting for the summer rain, yeah....

    The killer awoke before dawn
    He put his boots on
    He took a face from the ancient gallery
    And he walked on down the hall"

    ===============

    The bond used to be Fidelity. In consent, a bond can be an insurance policy to insure the bottom of the ship. But companies go bankrupt all the time and continue to work in restructure. So the question begging to be asked is: "If a company has filed for bankruptcy, then how do I use the courts to collect a debt that is noticed on UCC1?" Or better asked "How do I get a judgment against the actors in and for said company in their individual capacities such that said judgment can be filed on the County against their legal names?"

    Clearly a $5000 bond used to understand the office of District Attorney is fungible but if it is exceeded in judgment, then how to collect individually? Can a man shirk liability of his actions? I would say no, but then again I am continually amazed at the nonsense portrayed these days by the actors wearing badges and feminine black dresses.
    Last edited by Michael Joseph; 10-30-20 at 01:41 PM.
    The blessing is in the hand of the doer. Faith absent deeds is dead.

    Lawful Money Trust Website

    Divine Mind Community Call - Sundays 8pm EST

    ONE man or woman can make a difference!

  8. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by Michael Joseph View Post
    Now consider the ramifications of such an EO and the constitution. Remember that the State cannot pass a law which interferes with the obligations of an existing contract...
    The Constitution is suspended in the actual theater of war. We cleared way for remedy with the Olympus Ordeal alright. However if you examine the Executive Orders regarding COVID-19 it is clear Donald John feels he can utilize Title 50 where the Trading with the Enemy Act resides in War and Military.

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael Joseph View Post
    How much chaos is needed to usher in their beloved Socialistic State under one religion?
    I call that commercial priestcraft and somehow or another the manna at Hathor Temple was abandoned and forgotten. Such a hoard must have been for the spiritual ascension of humanity. There is another instance where the Tribe of Dan started fabricating manna on Mount Hermon to the north and came under a severe attack from Jerusalem. These days it is fluoride in the toothpaste and drinking water.

    Clean up and decalcify your pineal gland to see.

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael Joseph View Post
    Honestly, I can't even believe how ridiculous this Covid business has gotten. Said governor even went so far as to say not wearing a mask is unpatriotic. Groaning inside.
    That is a major point about my invention.

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael Joseph View Post
    The bond used to be Fidelity. In consent, a bond can be an insurance policy to insure the bottom of the ship. But companies go bankrupt all the time and continue to work in restructure. So the question begging to be asked is: "If a company has filed for bankruptcy, then how do I use the courts to collect a debt that is noticed on UCC1?" Or better asked "How do I get a judgment against the actors in and for said company in their individual capacities such that said judgment can be filed on the County against their legal names?"
    Even so, such judgments are null. Government is an irrevocable trust but when the trustee is in breach, there are options.

    1. overthrow the government
    2. set passive and be ruled by vacant trustees
    3. become the solution - the resultant trustee


    Quote Originally Posted by Michael Joseph View Post
    Clearly a $5000 bond used to understand the office of District Attorney is fungible but if it is exceeded in judgment, then how to collect individually? Can a man shirk liability of his actions? I would say no, but then again I am continually amazed at the nonsense portrayed these days by the actors wearing badges and feminine black dresses.
    This is a good segue into Cheryl Marie's notice. I have attached Dan MAY's oath and bond. I should point out that when at the secretary's counter I wanted the bond and a lady pretending to be busy nearby said sternly, Oaths ONLY! I started to explain, OATHS ONLY!! When I said one more word - OATHS!!! ONLY!!!!

    But with this bond note that it is only valid if properly signed and it is not. So it is easily dodged by the insurance company.

    Attached Images Attached Images

  9. #19
    Quote Originally Posted by Cheryl Marie View Post
    Addressing the foregoing portions of your post:


    (1) Your reference to the common law of England states how it is applicable to the Territory (the Territorial government): “the Common Law of England, so far as the same is applicable, and of a general nature”. The applicability pertains to the American form of government, established per the Decl of Indep, and the Northwest Ordinance concerning the acquired western land-mass.
    It is easy to make that mistake, without having studied my work carefully. The territory became on February 28 and the Congress adjourned March 28 (1861) leaving the cure term short by a day, for the proper formation of the Territory.


    Quote Originally Posted by Cheryl Marie View Post
    (2) Your claim that the Colorado Territory never properly formed is precluded by your above reference to that Territory. The western land was originally divided into two general Territories (northern and southern), likely for the benefit of the army protecting the settlers and for the judges riding circuit, from a governmental management standpoint. The Northwest Ordinance provides for people to settle and together form a State Territory, or territorial State, and then for said people to apply for inclusion in the Union of States. To my understanding, Colorado was a territorial State, but not yet included in the Union of States at the start of the Civil War, having satisfied the requirement of the number of permanent settlers. That is why the seal shows both societal designations.
    I concede to your notice, to keep the peace. I am sick and tired of being goaded into various wars. Even though I point out your mistake about the formation of the territory, you have a good point. But the common law of England was around before the ill-formed Territory...


    Quote Originally Posted by Cheryl Marie View Post
    (3) Your statement that ‘these days the territory is virtual’ is accurate, because that term does not pertain to the governmental Territory. My history synopsis explains that foreign bankers utilized the aftermath of the Civil War as the opportunity to establish a commerce-based territory, based from the District of Columbia, that the American people could energize. President Trump is in the process of shutting down the federal-level breach of our governmental structure caused by the bankers. But it is we people who must start operating civilian government at the State level.
    The fiat began with Governor GILPIN on the non-territory, leaving Colorado a war chest for the Union side of a self-prosecution. If the American people lack knowledge how to energize their estates they are simply masks. Donald John's process of shutting down? That was so at the starting gate. Robert Glover is not the chief justice of the US Supreme Court and therefore the Inauguration was an act. Dinner theater.


    This is why we manage the Reelection from virtual embassy and consul - diversity of citizenship under the 'saving to suitors' clause in a club. More on that afterward... But please remember that Donald John is not the President.

    Spend a little time on the photos I just added at the bottom. Notice Olga is Russian/Ukrainian.

    Quote Originally Posted by Cheryl Marie View Post
    (4) BERNARD is not pretending to be judicial. He’s operating administrative law in the commercial jurisdiction STATE OF ____ . As I’ve previously pointed to, the oath displaying SO HELP ME GOD secures that the oath taker is bound as a commerce officer, and is not impersonating a judicial officer of the soil and land jurisdiction of a State in the Union.



    (5) There is no such Patent number 10, 999,999. The USPTO utilizes the number 10 to designate a “Utility” patent application. Here’s the link from USPTO.org https://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/s1485.html


    Notice this example presented there showing Application No. 10/999,999, pertaining to UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION, for correction in avoidance of abandonment of claim.


    Patent No.: 9,999,999
    Application No.: 10/999,999
    Issue Date: May 1, 2002
    Inventor(s): Eli Y. Rosenthal


    (6) You sent your invention description to the USPTO of the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE. The Application number assigned is 17/023,866. The number 17 may internally designate a Utility Application.
    After pointing out the two mistakes you have made leading you to this statement you have not changed your mind, then I concede to your reality. I am notified. Many times I am prepared for such a challenge and would simply point out the R4C pending waiver of tort on BRYAN and MARTINEZ oaths. Notice that they have altered their oaths.

    Quote Originally Posted by Cheryl Marie View Post
    (7) You are making a claim that you have “US Patent #10,999,999, when no such US Patent number exists.
    That is what I have notified the USPTO about. US Patent #10,999,999.

    Quote Originally Posted by Cheryl Marie View Post
    How can you be the trustee of this commerce-based matter, even if you claim the USPTO is an entity in bankruptcy? Furthermore, as I’ve also provided, the Venetian-family cartels controlling the USPTO are fulfilling what they deem is their duty – enslaving the earth’s population by any means.
    Yes. I have been duly notified of your reality. I concede. You are right. When it comes down to brass tacks though I will likely be unaffected. I have scripted a great response to somebody making comment in prosecution - That if they would note, this is before BRYAN and MARTINEZ, two alleged federal judges. If they are not telling me that US Patent #10,999,999 does not exist, it probably does indeed exist. They are trained attorneys who know about the resulting trust.

    Like I said, through the breach of trust. BERNARD does indeed pretend to be judicial. It says so at the top of his biography I presented earlier in this thread.

    Quote Originally Posted by Cheryl Marie View Post
    If anything might be valid about your claim, you should be publishing Notice of your claim on what the USPTO claims is “this application 17/023,866” (my emphasis). They are obviously referring to ‘application’ as a noun. You seem to be referring to ‘application’ as a verb --- your managing of energy flow with your non-commercial use of that number per the right acquired via your declaration of authority: Lawful Money, and your unique thumbprint.
    I concede if you are prosecuting for the USPTO. You have given me notice of your reality and I am not going to deprive you or even bother trying to convince you otherwise. I listed a few emails and if you get a look at the domains you might start getting where I have been giving notice too - of my reality. And so they concede as they take in the results of the IMF summit.

    And like you said, the Vaccine is awesome.

    Name:  Notice to Olga 1.jpg
Views: 98
Size:  385.3 KB

    Name:  Notice to Olga 2.jpg
Views: 94
Size:  364.7 KB

    Name:  Notice to Olga 3 s.jpg
Views: 94
Size:  495.0 KB

    I have redacted specifics so that you do not confuse her. Either way though, I am sure your warnings would simply interest her the more.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  10. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by Cheryl Marie View Post
    In addition to the above --

    If you're saying that the people who formed the Colorado territorial state compact had been noticing the people of the Union that they had reached the permanent-population number to qualify for separate territorial-government (land-dominion) status, rather than seeking Union status, then that issue was what would need to be verified. But until verified, their territorial status was not ill-formed. Their intent must be considered valid. So the silver used by the governor was a usurpation of the peoples' valid authority to exercise their societal right of dominion over the certain soil boundary, unless the people consented.
    The formation was never ratified through Congress. It was play acting.

    The US Patent #10,999,999 has been issued to my invention. I never actually published R4C on BRYAN. Even in this Notice of the patent, I just write below - Note, this oath has been altered from the Form of Oath. That contemplates I might disqualify him. For now, he is useful because he is publishing law from chambers for me.

    This is what I meant by warring. If BRYAN and "Chief Judge" MARTINEZ are compliant with my authority as lienholder, then there is no reason or interest in pointing out your mistakes here. Thank you for insight on those governed by the Pope (CQV Trust) and the Venetians. The conveyances of energy are articulated clearly in your posts.


    P.S. The R4C and Doc 15 were delivered yesterday at 7:40 am. 9500 1130 2198 0301 3226 75
    Last edited by David Merrill; 10-31-20 at 06:12 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •