I researched that too. It is a bogus claim.Originally Posted by walter
Watched that video the other. Got a kick out of it when the interviewer tried to say that a immune system to strong is no good for your health.
Quackery.
Banking Kings Rothschilds was working on the patent before covid19 came out.
But we can trust the Rothschilds right?
This is what I am talking about. If you pursue the wrong arguments, misinformation and false claims then people will stop listening to you. Or worse they will start spattering your misinformation further all over the Internet.
It feels like a challenge though. Even with me showing you here, you do not see. So it makes me doubt that anybody is aware of the real danger and so those for depopulation get their way through the vaccine. While those against the depopulation render themselves inert to do anything about it. So I pretty much just sit and watch.
I am thinking to "mature mRNA" and test it out on my dog. When I grow tired of one breed, I will punch in a few protein strings and change him/her into another dog. Judging by my patented vaccine, I will get it right the first try. No science needed.
P.S. The claim you make, by displaying that misinformation is that by using the term "COVID-19" in the 2020 patent application, that this inventor, whose name happens to be ROTHSCHILD, was using that same term "COVID-19" in 2015. Untrue. There are two blatant falsities:
- this "ROTHSCHILD" is directly related to any banking empire
- that he was using the term COVID-19 prior to 2019 when it was coined
- additionally, you imply that by being against your misinformation that I am for the vaccine - untrue!
I am familiar with the attorney strategy to select one single false or unfounded argument, that fails Rules of Evidence to ruin any entire opposing cause.
Reply With Quote