Hi Mod;
We are finding among the suitors, the problem is the US Treasury itself is obfuscating service of process. Look at these Return Receipts.
Just to get hands-on feel look at the delivery dates for yourself.
Tracking - enter the Registered Mail #. Then take a look and judge for yourself.
This is arguably the statute but instead, the postal carrier neglected to keep the Return Receipt in their USPS custody and left that with the recipient.
There are other statutes that describe this convolution, handing off the Return Receipt to the recipient. But I think
the slam-dunk charge is delay.
See how the item was delivered on June 25, 2021 (the 24th to PELOSI) but shows delivery on July 16 to the Fresno IRS Campus? So it is still a crime of diversion, if not theft. The statute says demand redemption of the Treasury of the US. The US Treasury behaves as though they can defer their obligation to hear a redemption demand.
As process develops I should stock examples in the
Exactly What does the IRS Agent Think thread. That might be a good place to find things like this. But even that is a huge thread.
I will email you directly about my Lesson Plan. We all know I do not have control over IRS agents and as you see PELOSI seems to have tipped off the Treasury that they can misbehave rather than to assure honor about redemption. Shame on her. But we can perfect delivery, say for example how the correct checkboxes were checked on the Return Receipt. Another thing reading the Attached DMM passage; One should be certain that the USPS clerk stamps the Return Receipt Requested on the front of the package, to bring it to the Postal Carrier's attention that there is a card on the back. Better yet, when it is stamped so get a photo on your phone camera.
That sort of thing is a lesson for the brain trust.