Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: The New Deal's administrative acts unlawful.

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    The New Deal's administrative acts unlawful.

    There is a post here somewhere where David talks how the attorney general under Roosevelt was fired or died when they had the governors come in to Washington D.C. to push the fiat currency accounts. Listen to this guy about getting people's stuff back from the confiscation of State's agencies: https://rumble.com/v40mjti-state-and...tml?start=4354

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by Gavilan View Post
    There is a post here somewhere where David talks how the attorney general under Roosevelt was fired or died when they had the governors come in to Washington D.C. to push the fiat currency accounts. Listen to this guy about getting people's stuff back from the confiscation of State's agencies: https://rumble.com/v40mjti-state-and...tml?start=4354
    Amazing synchronicity. I used that Cold Case just recently for KAVANAUGH and GORSUCH to review the use of the TWEA, in a habeas corpus with the income tax treated like a prison.

  3. #3
    Here I have fashioned a sanitized rendition to prove my point. First watch what went down with GORSUCH. That got me thinking.

    Name:  Motion for Habeas Corpus KAVANAUGH GORSUCH-page1.jpeg
Views: 34
Size:  1.67 MB

    Name:  Motion for Habeas Corpus KAVANAUGH GORSUCH-page2.jpeg
Views: 36
Size:  1.63 MB

    Name:  Motion for Habeas Corpus KAVANAUGH GORSUCH-page3.jpeg
Views: 34
Size:  1.60 MB

    Name:  Motion for Habeas Corpus KAVANAUGH GORSUCH-page4.jpeg
Views: 35
Size:  681.4 KB

    Continued...
    Attached Images Attached Images

  4. #4
    Continued from above...

    There are some things the layman must develop an eye for.

    1. there are two oaths - civil and judicial
    2. Chief "Justice" Roberts will not sign a correct judicial oath
    3. GORSUCH was an administrative hearing officer as Circuit Justice
    4. GORSUCH as Circuit Justice signed an illegal "combined" oath


    The "combined judicial and civil oath" is allegedly an invention of the US Supreme Court. It is illegal because the USSC is not a legislative body. The US Supreme Court has no authority to be revising federal oaths of office. Only Congress can do so.

    Name:  Motion for Habeas Corpus KAVANAUGH GORSUCH-page5.jpeg
Views: 40
Size:  756.6 KB

    Name:  Motion for Habeas Corpus KAVANAUGH GORSUCH-page6.jpeg
Views: 33
Size:  787.4 KB

    Name:  Motion for Habeas Corpus KAVANAUGH GORSUCH-page7.jpeg
Views: 36
Size:  891.1 KB

    Name:  Motion for Habeas Corpus KAVANAUGH GORSUCH-page8.jpeg
Views: 35
Size:  905.0 KB

    Name:  Motion for Habeas Corpus KAVANAUGH GORSUCH-page9.jpeg
Views: 36
Size:  1.46 MB

  5. #5

    Memorandum of Law about federal oaths of office

    By yours truly:

    INVESTIGATION INTO DEVIANT OATHS - Memorandum and Information.pdf


    In the habeas corpus it mentions how the States redeem lawful money by demand. State Codes for Lawful Money Redemption with Bonds.pdf.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •